Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
CompletedIICSA
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) was a statutory inquiry established to investigate whether public bodies and other non-state institutions in England and Wales have taken seriously their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse. The Inquiry examined institutional failures across religious organisations, schools, local authorities, the NHS, the internet industry, and other settings.
Live tracking hearings, witnesses and documents synced daily from the inquiry website
Open live tracker
Search evidence
7 years, 7 months
Duration
£190m
Total Cost
725
Witnesses
325
Hearing Days
195,034
Documents
Parliamentary Activity 107 Click to expand
76 questions
31 statements
since Sep 2016
20 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
13 Jan 2026
13 Jan 2026
View all 107 mentions →
Reports (16) Click to expand
Timeline (7) Click to expand
07 Jul 2014
Inquiry Announced
Home Secretary announced inquiry into institutional child sexual abuse.
Source
16 Jan 2015
Terms of Reference Set
Broad terms examining institutional failures to protect children.
12 Aug 2016
Chair Appointed
Professor Alexis Jay appointed as fourth and final Chair.
07 Mar 2017
Public Hearings Begin
First public hearings commenced.
06 Aug 2018
First Reports Published
Investigation reports into various institutions began publication.
Costs Click to expand
Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative)
£189,963,980
to Mar 2023
IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023
Cost Breakdown (to Mar 2023)
Inquiry Legal Costs
£52,079,728
Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs
-
Legal funding for core participants
Panel
£4,808,410
Staff
£85,624,282
Accommodation
£10,234,048
Technology
£8,191,929
Safeguarding
£1,085,618
Other
£27,185,751
Cumulative total over 8 years. The inquiry ran from 2015 to October 2022, with final report published 20 October 2022. Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements.
Cost History
Recommendations (3)
85
Accepted
Access to records for former child migrants
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel have recommended that all institutions which sent children abroad as part of the child migration programmes should ensure that they have robust systems in place for retaining and preserving any remaining records that may contain information …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- Between January and July 2020, multiple institutions that sent children abroad under migration programmes, including Action for Children, Barnardo's, Catholic Church, Cornwall Council and the Salvation Army, stated that they had systems in place for retaining and providing access to records (Government Response, Various Institutions, January-July 2020).
- In May 2023, the government noted that most named institutions had responded to this recommendation (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published independent audit of whether all named institutions have robust record retention systems in place as specified has been identified to March 2026.
- In May 2023, the government noted that most named institutions had responded to this recommendation (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published independent audit of whether all named institutions have robust record retention systems in place as specified has been identified to March 2026.
Child Migration Institutions
(Primary)
View Details
92
Accepted
Apologies to former child migrants
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel have recommended that institutions involved in the child migration programmes who have not apologised for their role should give such apologies as soon as possible. Apologies should not only be made through public statements but specifically …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- Between January and July 2020, multiple institutions involved in child migration programmes provided apologies, including the Sisters of Nazareth, Action for Children, Barnardo's, Catholic Church, Cornwall Council and the Salvation Army (Government Response, Various Institutions, January-July 2020).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that the majority of named institutions had apologised as recommended (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that the majority of named institutions had apologised as recommended (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
Child Migration Institutions
(Primary)
View Details
93
Accepted
Financial redress for former child migrants
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel have recommended that the UK government establishes a financial redress scheme for surviving former child migrants, providing for an equal award to every applicant. This is on the basis that they were all exposed to the …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- On 22 July 2019, the UK government stated that an ex gratia payment scheme opened to applicants on 1 March 2019 for former British child migrants (Government Response, Home Office, July 2019).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that the financial redress scheme for former child migrants was operational and that payments had been made (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that the financial redress scheme for former child migrants was operational and that payments had been made (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
UK Government
(Primary)
View Details