Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
CompletedIICSA
The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA) was a statutory inquiry established to investigate whether public bodies and other non-state institutions in England and Wales have taken seriously their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse. The Inquiry examined institutional failures across religious organisations, schools, local authorities, the NHS, the internet industry, and other settings.
Live tracking hearings, witnesses and documents synced daily from the inquiry website
Open live tracker
Search evidence
7 years, 7 months
Duration
£190m
Total Cost
725
Witnesses
325
Hearing Days
195,034
Documents
Parliamentary Activity 107 Click to expand
76 questions
31 statements
since Sep 2016
20 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
13 Jan 2026
13 Jan 2026
View all 107 mentions →
Reports (16) Click to expand
Timeline (7) Click to expand
07 Jul 2014
Inquiry Announced
Home Secretary announced inquiry into institutional child sexual abuse.
Source
16 Jan 2015
Terms of Reference Set
Broad terms examining institutional failures to protect children.
12 Aug 2016
Chair Appointed
Professor Alexis Jay appointed as fourth and final Chair.
07 Mar 2017
Public Hearings Begin
First public hearings commenced.
06 Aug 2018
First Reports Published
Investigation reports into various institutions began publication.
Costs Click to expand
Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative)
£189,963,980
to Mar 2023
IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023
Cost Breakdown (to Mar 2023)
Inquiry Legal Costs
£52,079,728
Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs
-
Legal funding for core participants
Panel
£4,808,410
Staff
£85,624,282
Accommodation
£10,234,048
Technology
£8,191,929
Safeguarding
£1,085,618
Other
£27,185,751
Cumulative total over 8 years. The inquiry ran from 2015 to October 2022, with final report published 20 October 2022. Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements.
Cost History
Recommendations (7)
Research high child remand population
Recommendation
The Inquiry was told that children should only be placed in custody as a last resort. However, it was concerned to hear evidence that some children are remanded in custody because of a lack of appropriate community provision. Given that …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In January 2022, the Ministry of Justice published its Review of Custodial Remand for Children, which challenged the narrative that children are frequently remanded due to lack of appropriate accommodation (Government Response, Ministry of Justice, January 2022).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that it had implemented this recommendation (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that it had implemented this recommendation (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
Youth Custody Service
(Primary)
View Details
Review mixed justice/welfare placement risk
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Department for Education and the Youth Custody Service conduct a full review of the practice of placing children for justice and welfare reasons together in secure children's homes to establish whether it increases …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- On 7 May 2021, the Department for Education published its review of placement practices in secure children's homes, concluding that the practice of placing children for justice and welfare reasons together was appropriate subject to safeguards (Government Response, Department for Education, May 2021).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that this recommendation had been completed (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- In May 2023, the government confirmed that this recommendation had been completed (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
Department for Education
(Primary)
View Details
Prohibit pain compliance techniques
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel consider that the use of pain compliance techniques should be seen as a form of child abuse, and that it is likely to contribute to a culture of violence, which may increase the risk of child …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In June 2020, the Ministry of Justice published the Charlie Taylor review of pain-inducing techniques in the youth secure estate, which recommended changes to restraint training (Government Response, Ministry of Justice, June 2020).
- In May 2023, the government stated that it had removed Minimising and Managing Physical Restraint (MMPR) techniques from the standard training syllabus but retained a separate emergency intervention package (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- The government rejected the recommendation to ban all pain compliance techniques, stating staff require these tools for emergency scenarios (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- In May 2023, the government stated that it had removed Minimising and Managing Physical Restraint (MMPR) techniques from the standard training syllabus but retained a separate emergency intervention package (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- The government rejected the recommendation to ban all pain compliance techniques, stating staff require these tools for emergency scenarios (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details
Joint MoJ/DfE policy for children in custody
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Education share policy responsibility for managing and safeguarding children in custodial institutions. This is to ensure that standards applied in relation to children in custody are …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In July 2019, the Ministry of Justice stated that it had joint working relationships with the Department for Education on secure children's homes, including information sharing (Government Response, Ministry of Justice, July 2019).
- In May 2023, the government stated that joint policy responsibility was being progressed through cross-departmental working arrangements (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published formal shared policy responsibility framework between the Ministry of Justice and Department for Education for custodial institutions has been identified to March 2026.
- In May 2023, the government stated that joint policy responsibility was being progressed through cross-departmental working arrangements (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published formal shared policy responsibility framework between the Ministry of Justice and Department for Education for custodial institutions has been identified to March 2026.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details
Youth Custody Service safeguarding training
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Youth Custody Service takes steps to ensure that its training provides staff with an appropriate understanding of safeguarding in the context of the secure estate, and that this is regularly reviewed and updated.
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In July 2019, the Ministry of Justice stated that the Youth Custody Service would review mandatory training for frontline staff including safeguarding components (Government Response, Ministry of Justice, July 2019).
- In May 2023, the government stated that training reviews were ongoing (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published independent assessment of whether Youth Custody Service training now provides appropriate understanding of safeguarding in secure estate contexts has been identified to March 2026.
- In May 2023, the government stated that training reviews were ongoing (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published independent assessment of whether Youth Custody Service training now provides appropriate understanding of safeguarding in secure estate contexts has been identified to March 2026.
Youth Custody Service
(Primary)
View Details
Professional registration for custodial care staff
Recommendation
As the Inquiry set out in its Interim Report, professional registration of the workforce in settings responsible for the care of vulnerable children complements regulation of institutions by a separate, independent regulator. The government has agreed in principle that professional …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In November 2021, the Ministry of Justice stated that it had reviewed evidence from a targeted consultation on professional registration for the youth custody workforce (Government Response, Ministry of Justice, November 2021).
- In May 2023, the government stated that it accepted the need for registration of the youth custody workforce and was exploring implementation proposals (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published professional registration scheme for the youth custody workforce has been identified to March 2026.
- In May 2023, the government stated that it accepted the need for registration of the youth custody workforce and was exploring implementation proposals (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published professional registration scheme for the youth custody workforce has been identified to March 2026.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details
Revise Prison Service safeguarding guidance
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel note that Prison Service Instruction 08/2012, which sets out the mandatory actions for young offender institutions and secure training centres for 'maintaining a safe and secure environment', has expired. The Chair and Panel recommend that the …
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In July 2019, the Ministry of Justice stated that work had begun to revise or replace Prison Service Instructions with policy frameworks (Government Response, Ministry of Justice, July 2019).
- In May 2023, the government stated that PSI 08/2012 was under review as part of the policy frameworks programme (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published replacement policy framework for PSI 08/2012 has been identified to March 2026.
- In May 2023, the government stated that PSI 08/2012 was under review as part of the policy frameworks programme (Government Response to IICSA Final Report, HM Government, May 2023).
- No published replacement policy framework for PSI 08/2012 has been identified to March 2026.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details