Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse
CompletedIICSA
Wide-ranging inquiry into institutional failures to protect children from sexual abuse in England and Wales.
7 years, 7 months
Duration
£190m
Total Cost
725
Witnesses
325
Hearing Days
195,034
Documents
Parliamentary Activity 96 Click to expand
76 questions
20 statements
since Oct 2016
20 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
12 Feb 2026
13 Jan 2026
13 Jan 2026
View all 96 mentions →
Reports (16) Click to expand
Timeline (7) Click to expand
07 Jul 2014
Inquiry Announced
Home Secretary announced inquiry into institutional child sexual abuse.
Source
16 Jan 2015
Terms of Reference Set
Broad terms examining institutional failures to protect children.
12 Aug 2016
Chair Appointed
Professor Alexis Jay appointed as fourth and final Chair.
07 Mar 2017
Public Hearings Begin
First public hearings commenced.
06 Aug 2018
First Reports Published
Investigation reports into various institutions began publication.
Costs Click to expand
Total Inquiry Cost (Cumulative)
£189,963,980
to Mar 2023
IICSA Total Expenditure 2015-2023
Cost Breakdown (to Mar 2023)
Inquiry Legal Costs
£52,079,728
Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs
-
Legal funding for core participants
Panel
£4,808,410
Staff
£85,624,282
Accommodation
£10,234,048
Technology
£8,191,929
Safeguarding
£1,085,618
Other
£27,185,751
Cumulative total over 8 years. The inquiry ran from 2015 to October 2022, with final report published 20 October 2022. Core participant legal costs were funded but not separately reported in IICSA financial statements.
Cost History
Recommendations (7)
Research high child remand population
Recommendation
The Inquiry was told that children should only be placed in custody as a last resort. However, it was concerned to hear evidence that some children are remanded in custody because of a lack of appropriate community provision. Given that …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice published its Review of Custodial Remand for Children on 26 January 2022, directly addressing the recommendation for research into the high child remand population (Official government response, 22 May 2023). The review's findings challenged the narrative that remand is overused, highlighted factors impacting the increase in children on remand, and noted ongoing issues with short remand episodes and ethnic disproportionality. No further published evidence has been identified since January 2022.
Youth Custody Service
(Primary)
View Details
Review mixed justice/welfare placement risk
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Department for Education and the Youth Custody Service conduct a full review of the practice of placing children for justice and welfare reasons together in secure children's homes to establish whether it increases …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Department for Education published its review of placement practices in secure children's homes on 7 May 2021, fulfilling the recommendation to assess the risk of sexual abuse from placing children for justice and welfare reasons together (Official government response, 22 May 2023). The review concluded that this practice does not create or exacerbate systemic risk of child sexual abuse, and consequently, the Department for Education did not propose exploring alternative models. No further published evidence has been identified since May 2021.
Department for Education
(Primary)
View Details
Prohibit pain compliance techniques
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel consider that the use of pain compliance techniques should be seen as a form of child abuse, and that it is likely to contribute to a culture of violence, which may increase the risk of child …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice did not accept this recommendation. A review by Charlie Taylor, published on 18 June 2020, recommended amending the Minimising and Managing Physical Restraint (MMPR) programme to remove pain-inducing techniques from its syllabus, but permitted their use to prevent serious physical harm (Official government response, 4 May 2022). No further published evidence has been identified since May 2022.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details
Joint MoJ/DfE policy for children in custody
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Ministry of Justice and the Department for Education share policy responsibility for managing and safeguarding children in custodial institutions. This is to ensure that standards applied in relation to children in custody are …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice did not accept this recommendation. The Ministry of Justice stated on 23 July 2019 that it maintains joint working relationships with the Department for Education on secure children's homes, safeguarding, and establishing secure schools, with an aim to replace young offender institutions and secure training centres (Official government response, 4 May 2022). No further published evidence has been identified since May 2022.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details
Youth Custody Service safeguarding training
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Youth Custody Service takes steps to ensure that its training provides staff with an appropriate understanding of safeguarding in the context of the secure estate, and that this is regularly reviewed and updated.
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice stated on 23 July 2019 that the Youth Custody Service (YCS) would review mandatory training for frontline staff (Official government response, 4 May 2022). The YCS published its national safeguarding review on 4 October 2019, which recommended that YCS sites, in conjunction with local authority designated officers, develop specific and localised training. No further published evidence has been identified since May 2022.
Youth Custody Service
(Primary)
View Details
Professional registration for custodial care staff
Recommendation
As the Inquiry set out in its Interim Report, professional registration of the workforce in settings responsible for the care of vulnerable children complements regulation of institutions by a separate, independent regulator. The government has agreed in principle that professional …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice stated on 5 November 2021 that it had reviewed evidence from a targeted consultation on professional registration, and on 4 May 2022, it was considering this review (Official government response, 4 May 2022). A government progress update from April 2025 indicated that the government would undertake a programme of work to improve safeguarding and build workforce capability in the youth justice estate, including reviewing recruitment, training, and qualifications for staff.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details
Revise Prison Service safeguarding guidance
Recommendation
The Chair and Panel note that Prison Service Instruction 08/2012, which sets out the mandatory actions for young offender institutions and secure training centres for 'maintaining a safe and secure environment', has expired. The Chair and Panel recommend that the …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice stated on 23 July 2019 that work had begun to revise or replace Prison Service Instructions (PSIs) with 'policy frameworks' (Official government response, 4 May 2022). The Youth Custody Service published a policy framework that replaced some aspects of PSI 08/2012 relating to behaviour management of children. As of 4 May 2022, early work had started on producing the Care and Management of Young People framework, which is intended to replace PSI 08/2012. No further published evidence has been identified since May 2022.
Ministry of Justice
(Primary)
View Details