Reports & recommendations

107 recommendations from 16 reports, each with the government response on the record. Filter by government response, report, nation or delivery status.

Title Volume Publication Date Recommendations Links
Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report Accountability and Reparations 19 Sep 2019 7
The Anglican Church Investigation Report Anglican Church 06 Oct 2020 8
The Anglican Church Case Studies Investigation Report Anglican Church Case Studies 09 May 2019 5
Child Migration Programmes Investigation Report Child Migration Programmes 01 Mar 2018 3
Children Outside the United Kingdom Phase 2 Investigation Report Children Outside UK 09 Jan 2020 5
Child Sexual Exploitation by Organised Networks Investigation Report CSE Networks 01 Feb 2022 6
Sexual Abuse of Children in Custodial Institutions: 2009-2017 Investigation Report Custodial Institutions 28 Feb 2019 7
The Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Final Report 20 Oct 2022 20
Interim Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Interim Report 25 Apr 2018 15
The Internet Investigation Report Internet 12 Mar 2020 4
Children in the Care of Lambeth Council Investigation Report Lambeth Council 27 Jul 2021 4
Children in the Care of the Nottinghamshire Councils Investigation Report Nottinghamshire Councils 31 Jul 2019 2
Child Protection in Religious Organisations and Settings Investigation Report Religious Organisations 02 Sep 2021 2
The Residential Schools Investigation Report Residential Schools 01 Mar 2022 7
The Roman Catholic Church Investigation Report Roman Catholic Church 10 Nov 2020 7
Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Investigation Report Westminster 25 Feb 2020 5

Recommendations (5)

37
Noted

Westminster whistleblowing policies for CSA

Recommendation
Government, political parties and other Westminster institutions must have whistleblowing policies and procedures which cover child sexual abuse and exploitation. Every employee must be aware that they can raise any concerns using these policies and that the policies are not …
In brief (written by this site)

In September 2020, HM Government reported that all government departments had whistleblowing policies in place, supported by a civil service model policy that specifically covers the abuse or mistreatment of children (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It stated in September 2020 that parliamentary procedures remain a matter for both Houses, while noting that an additional cross-government campaign was planned for 2021 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds no update since the government's response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
Government Departments All government departments have whistleblowing policies in place. To support departments in ensuring their policies are effective, a model policy is provided by Civil Service Employee Policy, part of Civil Service HR. This policy has been renamed ‘Raising a Concern’ in line with a recommendation made by Professor Thorburn. The change of emphasis in the name moves the policy away from the ‘whistleblowing’ term which we have found can discourage individuals wishing to raise a concern. The policy specifically mentions danger to environments or to people, where it gives the example of abuse or mistreatment of children. Civil …
Read full response to 37 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 37
38
Noted

Government department safeguarding policy reviews

Recommendation
The Cabinet Office must ensure that each government department reviews its child safeguarding policy or policies in light of the expert witness report of Professor Thoburn. There must also be published procedures to accompany their policies, in order that staff …
In brief (written by this site)

In September 2020, HM Government reported that all departments had been made aware of the recommendation and that Civil Service HR had launched a model safeguarding policy and a "Health Check" process (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It stated that a review of departmental use of these tools was planned for later that year (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds no update since the Cabinet Office's response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
All government departments have been made aware of the Inquiry’s recommendation and of the contents of Professor Thoburn’s detailed report. As Professor Thoburn’s report acknowledges - ‘It is appropriate that safeguarding policies and procedures will vary according to the differing remits of government departments … and extents to which employees provide services to children in general and specifically to children who are vulnerable to abuse’. Nonetheless, Civil Service HR has developed and launched a model safeguarding policy and a ‘Health Check’ process, which again have been made available to all departments. These products enable departments to robustly check their own …
Read full response to 38 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of 38
39
Accepted in part

Political party safeguarding policies

Recommendation
All political parties registered with the Electoral Commission in England and Wales must ensure that they have a comprehensive safeguarding policy. All political parties must also ensure that they have procedures to accompany their policies, in order that politicians, prospective …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended that political parties publish safeguarding policies overseen by the Electoral Commission. In September 2020, HM Government agreed that political parties should maintain child safeguarding and whistleblowing policies alongside procedures, advising parties to consult experts and publish their policies online (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). However, it stated that the commission lacked expertise in child safeguarding legislation and was not an appropriate regulator of these procedures (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It added that transparency would support public scrutiny, reflecting its position that individual parties should establish codes of conduct setting expectations for member behaviour (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Accepted in part
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
The government agrees that political parties should have in place a comprehensive child safeguarding and whistleblowing policy alongside the appropriate procedures. However, the Electoral Commission – whose remit is focused on electoral law – has no expertise in child safeguarding policies or legislation and is therefore not an appropriate regulator of the quality of these procedures. The government recommends that individual political parties work with child safeguarding experts to review their own policy and procedures, and that they publish those policies online on their websites to ensure that these details are accessible to the press and public. Such transparency will …
Read full response to 39 (opens in a new tab)
Political Parties (Primary)
View details of 39
99
Noted

Honours forfeiture for CSA convictions

Recommendation
The criteria for forfeiture of all honours must be formally extended to include convictions, cautions and cases decided by trial of the facts involving offences of child sexual abuse. This must be set out in a published policy and procedure, …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Cabinet Office to extend honours forfeiture criteria to child sexual abuse offences. In guidance updated in December 2025, the department specified forfeiture criteria covering sexual offences convictions and determinations following a trial of the facts, though cautions were not mentioned (Cabinet Office, Dec 2025). Previously, in September 2020, HM Government stated that the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals was conducting an in-depth review of forfeiture policy (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
The Honours and Appointments Secretariat in the Cabinet Office coordinates the operation of the honours system and supports the Forfeiture Committee and the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals (known as the HD Committee). The HD Committee is the policy forum for the honours system. It gives advice about possible changes to the honours system and military medals policy. This includes responsibility for policy on forfeiture of honours. Its members are senior officials in the Civil Service and the Royal Household. An honour can be revoked if it is determined that an individual has behaved in a …
Read full response to 99 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of 99
100
Noted

Posthumous honours forfeiture policy

Recommendation

The Cabinet Office should re-examine the policy on posthumous forfeiture, in order to consider the perspectives of victims and survivors of child sexual abuse.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Cabinet Office to re-examine posthumous honours forfeiture policy. In September 2020, HM Government stated in a response published by the department that the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals was taking forward an "in-depth review of forfeiture policy in this area" (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It explained that policy changes are made on advice from the committee and stated that it would keep the Inquiry informed of progress (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The response described a review of forfeiture policy, while posthumous forfeiture and the perspectives of victims and survivors were not mentioned in the sources (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
The Honours and Appointments Secretariat in the Cabinet Office coordinates the operation of the honours system and supports the Forfeiture Committee and the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals (known as the HD Committee). The HD Committee is the policy forum for the honours system. It gives advice about possible changes to the honours system and military medals policy. This includes responsibility for policy on forfeiture of honours. Its members are senior officials in the Civil Service and the Royal Household. An honour can be revoked if it is determined that an individual has behaved in a …
Read full response to 100 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of 100