Reports & recommendations

107 recommendations from 16 reports, each with the government response on the record. Filter by government response, report, nation or delivery status.

Title Volume Publication Date Recommendations Links
Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report Accountability and Reparations 19 Sep 2019 7
The Anglican Church Investigation Report Anglican Church 06 Oct 2020 8
The Anglican Church Case Studies Investigation Report Anglican Church Case Studies 09 May 2019 5
Child Migration Programmes Investigation Report Child Migration Programmes 01 Mar 2018 3
Children Outside the United Kingdom Phase 2 Investigation Report Children Outside UK 09 Jan 2020 5
Child Sexual Exploitation by Organised Networks Investigation Report CSE Networks 01 Feb 2022 6
Sexual Abuse of Children in Custodial Institutions: 2009-2017 Investigation Report Custodial Institutions 28 Feb 2019 7
The Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Final Report 20 Oct 2022 20
Interim Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Interim Report 25 Apr 2018 15
The Internet Investigation Report Internet 12 Mar 2020 4
Children in the Care of Lambeth Council Investigation Report Lambeth Council 27 Jul 2021 4
Children in the Care of the Nottinghamshire Councils Investigation Report Nottinghamshire Councils 31 Jul 2019 2
Child Protection in Religious Organisations and Settings Investigation Report Religious Organisations 02 Sep 2021 2
The Residential Schools Investigation Report Residential Schools 01 Mar 2022 7
The Roman Catholic Church Investigation Report Roman Catholic Church 10 Nov 2020 7
Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Investigation Report Westminster 25 Feb 2020 5

Recommendations (15)

1
Noted

Collect disaggregated CSE data

Recommendation
Police forces and local authorities in England and Wales must collect data on all cases of known or suspected child sexual exploitation and child sexual exploitation by networks. These data should be separated from other data sets, including data on …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the government to ensure authorities collect disaggregated child sexual exploitation data. In July 2022, HM Government stated that it was working with police to improve the collection, analysis, and use of child sexual exploitation data (Home Office response, Jul 2022; Home Office, Jul 2022). It highlighted funding for regional analysts and noted a mandatory requirement for police forces to record the ethnicity of suspected grooming gang arrestees (Home Office response, Jul 2022). The response did not mention local authorities or disaggregation by sex and disability, and noted that the first ethnicity data publications were expected in late 2023 (Home Office response, Jul 2022). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of July 2022 (Home Office response, Jul 2022).

UK Government · 27 Jul 2022 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Child sexual exploitation by organised networks report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse: government response, published by the Home Office, 27 July 2022
27. The Home Office recognises the importance of robust data collection on suspects and offenders to inform problem profiling and activities to disrupt and investigate offenders. That is why we are working with police to drive improvement in the collection, analysis and use of data on child sexual exploitation. 28. This includes funding dedicated child sexual abuse and exploitation analysts in every policing region. As well as informing local tasking to support forces in tackling child sexual exploitation, the analysts form a network which is improving understanding of this offending nationally as well as driving up data quality. 29. The …
Read full response to 1 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 1
9
Noted

Mandatory aggravating factor for CSE offences

Recommendation
The government should amend the Sentencing Act 2020 to provide a mandatory aggravating factor in sentencing in the case of the commission of an offence under Part 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 relating to a child, where (1) …
In brief (written by this site)

The Home Office and the Ministry of Justice stated in May 2026 that the Crime and Policing Act 2026 includes provisions to "legislate to make grooming an aggravating factor in the sentencing of child sexual offences" (Home Office and Ministry of Justice, May 2026). HM Government had previously stated in July 2022 that the factors set out in the recommendation were already adequately covered by existing criminal law and sentencing guidelines (Home Office response, Jul 2022; Home Office, Jul 2022).

UK Government · 27 Jul 2022 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Child sexual exploitation by organised networks report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse: government response, published by the Home Office, 27 July 2022
9. Crimes involving the sexual exploitation of children are totally abhorrent and offenders should face the full force of the law. The UK has some of the toughest powers in the world to deal with those convicted of child sexual offences, and the government is committed to ensuring that the penalties available to the courts are robust in order to deter and punish abusers. 10. The government has carefully considered this recommendation and appreciates the need to ensure sentences reflect the seriousness of such offending behaviour. We would be interested to see any evidence that the IICSA has collected that …
Read full response to 9 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 9
22
Noted

National chaperone policy for healthcare (England)

Recommendation
The Chair and Panel recommend that the Department of Health and Social Care develops a national policy for the training and use of chaperones in the treatment of children in healthcare services. The Chair and Panel recommend that the Care …
In brief (written by this site)

HM Government stated in July 2019 that NHS England had developed and published chaperone guidance notes to establish clear principles across healthcare settings, and that the Department of Health and Social Care would continue to require the Care Quality Commission to assess providers' chaperone policies during inspections (HM Government, Jul 2019). In October 2022, the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse recorded that the guidance had been produced and that the department would maintain these inspection requirements (The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

UK Government · 20 Dec 2018 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the interim report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (Cm 9756), December 2018
30. DHSC fully supports the use of chaperones for children, young people and adults at risk, when using healthcare services. To support organisations, NHS England has developed a chaperone guidance note which sets out clear principles of chaperoning and includes a number of examples of good practice chaperone policies which can be applied across a range of healthcare settings 31. All acute, community and primary care providers registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) are required to have active chaperone policies and protocols, which are regularly reviewed through scrutiny at provider organisation Boards or, in the case of primary care, …
Read full response to 22 (opens in a new tab)
Department of Health and Social Care (Primary)
View details of 22
37
Noted

Westminster whistleblowing policies for CSA

Recommendation
Government, political parties and other Westminster institutions must have whistleblowing policies and procedures which cover child sexual abuse and exploitation. Every employee must be aware that they can raise any concerns using these policies and that the policies are not …
In brief (written by this site)

In September 2020, HM Government reported that all government departments had whistleblowing policies in place, supported by a civil service model policy that specifically covers the abuse or mistreatment of children (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It stated in September 2020 that parliamentary procedures remain a matter for both Houses, while noting that an additional cross-government campaign was planned for 2021 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds no update since the government's response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
Government Departments All government departments have whistleblowing policies in place. To support departments in ensuring their policies are effective, a model policy is provided by Civil Service Employee Policy, part of Civil Service HR. This policy has been renamed ‘Raising a Concern’ in line with a recommendation made by Professor Thorburn. The change of emphasis in the name moves the policy away from the ‘whistleblowing’ term which we have found can discourage individuals wishing to raise a concern. The policy specifically mentions danger to environments or to people, where it gives the example of abuse or mistreatment of children. Civil …
Read full response to 37 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 37
38
Noted

Government department safeguarding policy reviews

Recommendation
The Cabinet Office must ensure that each government department reviews its child safeguarding policy or policies in light of the expert witness report of Professor Thoburn. There must also be published procedures to accompany their policies, in order that staff …
In brief (written by this site)

In September 2020, HM Government reported that all departments had been made aware of the recommendation and that Civil Service HR had launched a model safeguarding policy and a "Health Check" process (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It stated that a review of departmental use of these tools was planned for later that year (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds no update since the Cabinet Office's response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
All government departments have been made aware of the Inquiry’s recommendation and of the contents of Professor Thoburn’s detailed report. As Professor Thoburn’s report acknowledges - ‘It is appropriate that safeguarding policies and procedures will vary according to the differing remits of government departments … and extents to which employees provide services to children in general and specifically to children who are vulnerable to abuse’. Nonetheless, Civil Service HR has developed and launched a model safeguarding policy and a ‘Health Check’ process, which again have been made available to all departments. These products enable departments to robustly check their own …
Read full response to 38 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of 38
70
Noted

Include clergy in position of trust definition

Recommendation
The government should amend Section 21 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 so as to include clergy within the definition of a position of trust. This would criminalise under s16-s20 sexual activity between clergy and a person aged 16-18, over …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended amending sexual offences legislation to include clergy within positions of trust. In a letter of October 2019, published by the Ministry of Justice in November 2019, Chris Philp MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, stated that existing criminal law provided protections against sexual abuse and that a cross-government review of offences had been conducted (Chris Philp MP response, Oct 2019). The Minister explained that the government was considering the review's findings and would announce next steps in due course (Chris Philp MP, Nov 2019). Amending Section 21 to include clergy was not mentioned in the letter (Chris Philp MP response, Oct 2019; Chris Philp MP, Nov 2019).

Ministry of Justice · 31 Oct 2019 Noted
Words of: Chris Philp MP, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Justice, letter to Professor Alexis Jay OBE, Chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, 31 October 2019, published by the Ministry of Justice on 4 November 2019
I should first like to assure the Inquiry that the criminal law already provides a number of protections to deal with non-consensual and unwanted sexual activity and abuse. These offences rightly carry robust sentences to reflect the seriousness of such offending. We recognise that there are deeply-held concerns about those who might abuse their position of power over a 16 or 17-year-old to pressure them into engaging in sexual activity. Such behaviour is likely to be caught by the robust laws we already have in place, and I want to actively encourage anyone who feels that they are a victim …
Read full response to 70 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 70
71
Noted

Pre-screen material before upload

Recommendation

The government should require industry to pre-screen material before it is uploaded to the internet to prevent access to known indecent images of children.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the government to require companies to pre-screen material uploaded to the internet. In November 2020, HM Government stated that an interim code of practice on tackling child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) set out its expectation that companies prevent access to known abuse material (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). It noted that pre-screening is one way of preventing access, while recognising that responses vary according to the service offered (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The code builds upon voluntary principles launched with international partners to drive collective industry action (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
9. In March 2020, the UK, US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand launched the Voluntary Principles to Counter Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse. The principles were developed in consultation with six leading technology companies and a wide variety of experts from industry, civil society and academia, as well as the WeProtect Global Alliance (WPGA) [see paragraphs 17-23 below]. The principles aim to provide a framework to combat online CSEA, and are intended to drive collective action. 10. The aforementioned interim code of practice on tackling CSEA builds upon the Voluntary Principles which set out the UK Government’s expectation that …
Read full response to 71 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 71
80
Noted

National register of public liability insurance

Recommendation
The Department for Work and Pensions should work with the Association of British Insurers to introduce a national register of public liability insurance policies. The register should provide details of the relevant organisation, the name of the insurer, all relevant …
In brief (written by this site)

In April 2020, HM Government reported that it had begun and would continue discussions with the Association of British Insurers on the feasibility of establishing a public liability register (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). It stated that this work needed to be co-ordinated with other reform proposals to take a holistic approach to achieving justice for victims of child sexual abuse (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020). The record holds no update since the government's response of April 2020 (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020).

Ministry of Justice · 06 Apr 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, The Government response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse's Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report, published by the Ministry of Justice, 6 April 2020
The Government has begun and will continue discussions with the Association of British Insurers (ABI) on the feasibility of establishing a public liability register. It will also be important for this work to be co-ordinated with other reform proposals being considered arising from the Inquiry’s recommendations so that the Government and others are able to take a holistic approach to achieving justice for those who have been subjected to child sexual abuse.
Read full response to 80 (opens in a new tab)
Department for Work and Pensions (Primary)
View details of 80
95
Noted

CICA specialist caseworker training

Recommendation

The Chair and Panel recommend that CICA ensures that claims relating to child sexual abuse are only considered by caseworkers who have specific and detailed training in the nature and impact of child sexual abuse.

In brief (written by this site)

The recommendation asked that caseworkers handling child sexual abuse claims have specific training. In July 2019, HM Government stated that the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority had adapted operational practices and was providing named caseworkers for applicants affected by the pre-1979 same roof rule, but it did not mention specialist caseworker training (HM Government, Jul 2019). The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, on its website archived in October 2022, recorded the government's December 2018 response that all operational staff receive training on sexual abuse cases and that the authority was considering options to extend dedicated caseworkers beyond complex cases (HM Government response, Dec 2018; The Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, Oct 2022).

UK Government · 20 Dec 2018 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the interim report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (Cm 9756), December 2018
20. CICA, an Executive Agency of the MoJ, is responsible for operating the CICS and applying the rules to individual applications independently from ministers and Parliament. 21. All CICA operational staff are given training on sexual abuse cases, including child sexual abuse. CICA provides a dedicated caseworker to applicants in particularly complex and difficult cases and is considering options to extend this to other cases. In 2017, CICA worked with external stakeholders and victims’ groups to introduce more robust guidance and targeted training about grooming and exploitation for all staff dealing with applications from child victims of sexual abuse. In …
Read full response to 95 (opens in a new tab)
Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (Primary)
View details of 95
97
Noted

Clarify Compensation Act on apologies

Recommendation
The government should introduce legislation revising the Compensation Act 2006 to clarify that section 2 facilitates apologies or offers of treatment or other redress to victims and survivors of child sexual abuse by institutions that may be vicariously liable for …
In brief (written by this site)

In April 2020, HM Government stated that the Ministry of Justice would explore amending the Compensation Act 2006 or taking alternative action to clarify that its provisions facilitate apologies in vicarious liability cases (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). It noted that the statute was not intended to apply solely to claims in negligence and breach of statutory duty, and promised to provide an update in due course (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). The record holds no update since the government's response of April 2020 (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020; Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020).

Ministry of Justice · 06 Apr 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, The Government response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse's Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report, published by the Ministry of Justice, 6 April 2020
The focus of the 2006 Act on claims in negligence and breach of statutory duty is not intended to suggest that the provision is only of relevance to those proceedings (and under the common law it may equally be relevant elsewhere, including in cases involving vicarious liability). In light of the Inquiry’s views, officials at the Ministry of Justice will explore further whether it would be helpful to amend the 2006 Act or take alternative action to clarify that this is the case, and we will update the Inquiry in due course.
Read full response to 97 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 97
98
Noted

Increase use of criminal compensation orders

Recommendation
The Ministry of Justice should consult with the Sentencing Council, the Judicial College, the Crown Prosecution Service and other relevant bodies, in order to increase the use of CCOs, where appropriate, in cases involving child sexual abuse by, among other …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended consulting relevant bodies to increase the use of criminal compensation orders. In April 2020, HM Government stated that the Ministry of Justice had consulted the Judicial College, the Sentencing Council, and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), concluding that existing judicial guidance is sufficient (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020). It also noted that prosecutors are reminded in CPS legal guidance of their role in applying for compensation orders (Ministry of Justice, Apr 2020). The government stated that it would undertake further exploration to understand the low use of these orders, after which it would consider next steps and provide the Inquiry with a substantive response (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of April 2020 (Ministry of Justice response, Apr 2020).

Ministry of Justice · 06 Apr 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, The Government response to the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse's Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report, published by the Ministry of Justice, 6 April 2020
The Ministry of Justice has consulted with the Judicial College and the Sentencing Council in respect of implementing guidance for the judiciary in the Crown Court and Magistrates’ Courts, and with the CPS in respect of guidance for prosecutors. It is our collective view that the guidance referred to above is sufficient and that judges will already be aware of their sentencing powers, including the power to make a compensation order instead of, or in addition to, dealing with an offender in any other way. In addition, prosecutors will be ready to assist the court by drawing the court’s attention …
Read full response to 98 (opens in a new tab)
Ministry of Justice (Primary)
View details of 98
99
Noted

Honours forfeiture for CSA convictions

Recommendation
The criteria for forfeiture of all honours must be formally extended to include convictions, cautions and cases decided by trial of the facts involving offences of child sexual abuse. This must be set out in a published policy and procedure, …
In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Cabinet Office to extend honours forfeiture criteria to child sexual abuse offences. In guidance updated in December 2025, the department specified forfeiture criteria covering sexual offences convictions and determinations following a trial of the facts, though cautions were not mentioned (Cabinet Office, Dec 2025). Previously, in September 2020, HM Government stated that the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals was conducting an in-depth review of forfeiture policy (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
The Honours and Appointments Secretariat in the Cabinet Office coordinates the operation of the honours system and supports the Forfeiture Committee and the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals (known as the HD Committee). The HD Committee is the policy forum for the honours system. It gives advice about possible changes to the honours system and military medals policy. This includes responsibility for policy on forfeiture of honours. Its members are senior officials in the Civil Service and the Royal Household. An honour can be revoked if it is determined that an individual has behaved in a …
Read full response to 99 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of 99
100
Noted

Posthumous honours forfeiture policy

Recommendation

The Cabinet Office should re-examine the policy on posthumous forfeiture, in order to consider the perspectives of victims and survivors of child sexual abuse.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the Cabinet Office to re-examine posthumous honours forfeiture policy. In September 2020, HM Government stated in a response published by the department that the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals was taking forward an "in-depth review of forfeiture policy in this area" (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020; Cabinet Office, Sep 2020). It explained that policy changes are made on advice from the committee and stated that it would keep the Inquiry informed of progress (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The response described a review of forfeiture policy, while posthumous forfeiture and the perspectives of victims and survivors were not mentioned in the sources (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of September 2020 (Cabinet Office response, Sep 2020).

Cabinet Office · 18 Sep 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the IICSA Westminster report, published by the Cabinet Office, 18 September 2020
The Honours and Appointments Secretariat in the Cabinet Office coordinates the operation of the honours system and supports the Forfeiture Committee and the Committee on the Grant of Honours, Decorations and Medals (known as the HD Committee). The HD Committee is the policy forum for the honours system. It gives advice about possible changes to the honours system and military medals policy. This includes responsibility for policy on forfeiture of honours. Its members are senior officials in the Civil Service and the Royal Household. An honour can be revoked if it is determined that an individual has behaved in a …
Read full response to 100 (opens in a new tab)
Cabinet Office (Primary)
View details of 100
105
Noted

WeProtect international action on CSAM

Recommendation

The government should press the WeProtect Global Alliance to take more action internationally to ensure that those countries hosting indecent images of children implement legislation and procedures to prevent access to such imagery.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended pressing the WeProtect Global Alliance to curb child abuse material overseas. HM Government stated in November 2020 that, as a permanent member of the alliance's management board, it provides strategic leadership to direct prioritisation and engagement with partner countries and technology companies (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). It explained that the alliance was preparing for a 2021 summit in Brazil and working with regional bodies and individual countries to develop effective legislation (Home Office response, Nov 2020). While the response detailed legislative guidance and international engagement, procedures to prevent access to hosted imagery were not mentioned (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
19. Supported by a range of philanthropic donors, the WPGA will continue to lead in the fight against online CSEA. The UK Government is a permanent member of its new management board, and as such continues to have a degree of strategic leadership that allows us to help direct the WPGA’s prioritisation of its work, including online child sexual abuse and engagement with partner countries and technology companies in particular. 20. The UK Government will continue to work collaboratively with the WPGA to continue to make combatting indecent images of children, grooming and live streaming a top priority, both through …
Read full response to 105 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 105
106
Noted

Online age verification legislation

Recommendation

The government should introduce legislation requiring providers of online services and social media platforms to implement more stringent age verification techniques on all relevant devices.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended that the government legislate for stricter online age verification across platforms and devices. In November 2020, HM Government stated that age assurance and age verification would play a key role in its upcoming regulatory framework for online services, though it did not mention devices (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). It noted in November 2020 that platforms were expected to adopt proportionate tools to protect children and highlighted research it supported into the feasibility of identifying child users online (Home Office response, Nov 2020). It added in November 2020 that, ahead of legislation, it would publish guidance on embedding safety by design principles and develop practical advice for online companies (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
11. The Government’s initial response to the White Paper, published in February 2020, outlines our proposals for tackling online harms and delivering a higher level of protection for children than for the typical adult user. We set out the expectation that companies would use a proportionate range of tools, including age assurance and age verification technologies, to prevent children from accessing age-inappropriate content such as online pornography, and to protect them from other harms. 12. The Government has been clear that we expect companies to use a range of tools now to protect children online and that we expect that …
Read full response to 106 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 106