Reports & recommendations

107 recommendations from 16 reports, each with the government response on the record. Filter by government response, report, nation or delivery status.

Title Volume Publication Date Recommendations Links
Accountability and Reparations Investigation Report Accountability and Reparations 19 Sep 2019 7
The Anglican Church Investigation Report Anglican Church 06 Oct 2020 8
The Anglican Church Case Studies Investigation Report Anglican Church Case Studies 09 May 2019 5
Child Migration Programmes Investigation Report Child Migration Programmes 01 Mar 2018 3
Children Outside the United Kingdom Phase 2 Investigation Report Children Outside UK 09 Jan 2020 5
Child Sexual Exploitation by Organised Networks Investigation Report CSE Networks 01 Feb 2022 6
Sexual Abuse of Children in Custodial Institutions: 2009-2017 Investigation Report Custodial Institutions 28 Feb 2019 7
The Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Final Report 20 Oct 2022 20
Interim Report of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse Interim Report 25 Apr 2018 15
The Internet Investigation Report Internet 12 Mar 2020 4
Children in the Care of Lambeth Council Investigation Report Lambeth Council 27 Jul 2021 4
Children in the Care of the Nottinghamshire Councils Investigation Report Nottinghamshire Councils 31 Jul 2019 2
Child Protection in Religious Organisations and Settings Investigation Report Religious Organisations 02 Sep 2021 2
The Residential Schools Investigation Report Residential Schools 01 Mar 2022 7
The Roman Catholic Church Investigation Report Roman Catholic Church 10 Nov 2020 7
Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster Investigation Report Westminster 25 Feb 2020 5

Recommendations (4)

40
Accepted

Publish interim online harms code of practice

Recommendation

The government should publish, without further delay, the interim code of practice in respect of child sexual abuse and exploitation as proposed by the Online Harms White Paper (published April 2019).

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the government to publish an interim code of practice on child sexual abuse. In November 2020, HM Government stated that it was working with law enforcement agencies and other bodies to produce interim codes to bridge the gap until a regulator is operational (Home Office response, Nov 2020). In that November 2020 response, it confirmed that the interim code would be published alongside the full government response to the Online Harms White Paper (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Accepted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
7. The Online Harms White Paper committed the Government to working with law enforcement agencies and other relevant bodies to produce interim codes of practice on terrorism and child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) due to the serious nature of these harms. The interim codes are voluntary and intended to bridge the gap until the regulator is operational and ready to produce its own codes. 8. The interim code of practice on CSEA will be published alongside the full Government response to the White Paper referred to in paragraph 5 above.
Read full response to 40 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 40
71
Noted

Pre-screen material before upload

Recommendation

The government should require industry to pre-screen material before it is uploaded to the internet to prevent access to known indecent images of children.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry asked the government to require companies to pre-screen material uploaded to the internet. In November 2020, HM Government stated that an interim code of practice on tackling child sexual exploitation and abuse (CSEA) set out its expectation that companies prevent access to known abuse material (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). It noted that pre-screening is one way of preventing access, while recognising that responses vary according to the service offered (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The code builds upon voluntary principles launched with international partners to drive collective industry action (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
9. In March 2020, the UK, US, Australia, Canada and New Zealand launched the Voluntary Principles to Counter Online Child Sexual Exploitation and Abuse. The principles were developed in consultation with six leading technology companies and a wide variety of experts from industry, civil society and academia, as well as the WeProtect Global Alliance (WPGA) [see paragraphs 17-23 below]. The principles aim to provide a framework to combat online CSEA, and are intended to drive collective action. 10. The aforementioned interim code of practice on tackling CSEA builds upon the Voluntary Principles which set out the UK Government’s expectation that …
Read full response to 71 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 71
105
Noted

WeProtect international action on CSAM

Recommendation

The government should press the WeProtect Global Alliance to take more action internationally to ensure that those countries hosting indecent images of children implement legislation and procedures to prevent access to such imagery.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended pressing the WeProtect Global Alliance to curb child abuse material overseas. HM Government stated in November 2020 that, as a permanent member of the alliance's management board, it provides strategic leadership to direct prioritisation and engagement with partner countries and technology companies (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). It explained that the alliance was preparing for a 2021 summit in Brazil and working with regional bodies and individual countries to develop effective legislation (Home Office response, Nov 2020). While the response detailed legislative guidance and international engagement, procedures to prevent access to hosted imagery were not mentioned (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
19. Supported by a range of philanthropic donors, the WPGA will continue to lead in the fight against online CSEA. The UK Government is a permanent member of its new management board, and as such continues to have a degree of strategic leadership that allows us to help direct the WPGA’s prioritisation of its work, including online child sexual abuse and engagement with partner countries and technology companies in particular. 20. The UK Government will continue to work collaboratively with the WPGA to continue to make combatting indecent images of children, grooming and live streaming a top priority, both through …
Read full response to 105 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 105
106
Noted

Online age verification legislation

Recommendation

The government should introduce legislation requiring providers of online services and social media platforms to implement more stringent age verification techniques on all relevant devices.

In brief (written by this site)

The Inquiry recommended that the government legislate for stricter online age verification across platforms and devices. In November 2020, HM Government stated that age assurance and age verification would play a key role in its upcoming regulatory framework for online services, though it did not mention devices (Home Office response, Nov 2020; Home Office, Nov 2020). It noted in November 2020 that platforms were expected to adopt proportionate tools to protect children and highlighted research it supported into the feasibility of identifying child users online (Home Office response, Nov 2020). It added in November 2020 that, ahead of legislation, it would publish guidance on embedding safety by design principles and develop practical advice for online companies (Home Office response, Nov 2020). The record holds nothing dated later than the response of November 2020 (Home Office response, Nov 2020).

UK Government · 10 Nov 2020 Noted
Words of: HM Government, Government response to the Internet Report by the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, published by the Home Office, 10 November 2020
11. The Government’s initial response to the White Paper, published in February 2020, outlines our proposals for tackling online harms and delivering a higher level of protection for children than for the typical adult user. We set out the expectation that companies would use a proportionate range of tools, including age assurance and age verification technologies, to prevent children from accessing age-inappropriate content such as online pornography, and to protect them from other harms. 12. The Government has been clear that we expect companies to use a range of tools now to protect children online and that we expect that …
Read full response to 106 (opens in a new tab)
UK Government (Primary)
View details of 106