Brook House Inquiry
CompletedThe Brook House Inquiry examined mistreatment of detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick Airport between April and August 2017, following undercover footage broadcast by BBC Panorama. The inquiry found 19 incidents of mistreatment and made 33 recommendations.
3 years, 7 months
Duration
£20m
Total Cost
46
Hearing Days
24
Core Participants
100,000
Documents
Parliamentary Activity 24 Click to expand
1 debate
19 questions
4 statements
since Sep 2023
Written Question
Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
10 Jan 2025
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
18 Dec 2024
18 Dec 2024
Written Question
Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry
Siân Berry (Green Party)
13 Nov 2024
Siân Berry (Green Party)
12 Nov 2024
View all 24 mentions →
Reports (1) Click to expand
| Title | Volume | Publication Date | Recs | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Brook House Inquiry Report | Final Report | 19 Sep 2023 | 33 |
Timeline (8) Click to expand
01 Sep 2017
Panorama Broadcast
BBC Panorama broadcast undercover footage from Brook House IRC.
05 Nov 2019
Chair Appointed
Kate Eves appointed as Chair.
13 Feb 2020
Terms of Reference Set
Inquiry to examine treatment of detainees April-August 2017.
Source
01 Nov 2021
Hearings Begin
Public hearings commenced.
19 Sep 2023
Final Report Published
Report found "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" of detainees.
Source
19 Sep 2024
One Year Progress Update
Home Office published progress update one year after report.
Recommendations (3)
Introduce 28-day maximum time limit on detention
Recommendation
The government must introduce in legislation a maximum 28-day time limit on any individual's detention within an immigration removal centre.
Published evidence summary
The government rejected the recommendation to introduce a 28-day maximum time limit on immigration detention, stating it would impair the ability to remove individuals who have breached immigration laws (Government Response, March 2024). This rejection was confirmed in a Parliamentary Written Question in January 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, January 2025) and upheld by the High Court in July 2025, which found no legal obligation for the government to comply with inquiry recommendations (R (D1914) v SSHD [2025] EWHC 1853 (Admin)). As of August 2025, HM Inspectorate of Prisons reported that 67% of detainees were held for over two months, with the longest detention exceeding 550 days, indicating no change in practice (HM Inspectorate of Prisons report, September 2025).
Healthcare staff guidance and training on use of force incidents
Recommendation
The Home Office must ensure that guidance is issued to healthcare staff in immigration removal centres clarifying their role in use of force incidents. It must liaise as necessary with NHS England and any relevant medical regulators. The Home Office …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The government explicitly rejected this recommendation, stating that NHS England and the Care Quality Commission are responsible for assuring healthcare quality within the detention estate (Government Response, March 2024). This rejection was confirmed in a Written Parliamentary Question in January 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025).
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details
Enhance Professional Standards Unit independence and seniority
Recommendation
The Home Office must: take steps to enhance the independence of the Professional Standards Unit from the Home Office and the perception of this independence; and increase the seniority of the Head of the Professional Standards Unit so that they …
Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office explicitly rejected this recommendation in its March 2024 response, stating that the seniority of the Head of the Professional Standards Unit would not be changed. The government expressed confidence in existing ACAS Code compliance and Prisons and Probation Ombudsman escalation routes. A Written Parliamentary Question in January 2025 confirmed that this recommendation was among the three rejected by the government.
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details