Brook House Inquiry
CompletedThe Brook House Inquiry examined mistreatment of detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick Airport between April and August 2017, following undercover footage broadcast by BBC Panorama. The inquiry found 19 incidents of mistreatment and made 33 recommendations.
Live tracking hearings, witnesses and documents synced daily from the inquiry website
Open live tracker
Search evidence
3 years, 7 months
Duration
£285k
Total Cost
46
Hearing Days
24
Core Participants
100,000
Documents
Parliamentary Activity 22 Click to expand
1 debate
17 questions
4 statements
since Sep 2023
Written Question
Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
10 Jan 2025
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
18 Dec 2024
18 Dec 2024
Written Question
Mistreatment of Detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre Inquiry
Siân Berry (Green Party)
13 Nov 2024
Siân Berry (Green Party)
12 Nov 2024
View all 22 mentions →
Reports (1) Click to expand
| Title | Volume | Publication Date | Tracked recs | Links |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Brook House Inquiry Report | Final Report | 19 Sep 2023 | 33 |
Timeline (8) Click to expand
01 Sep 2017
Panorama Broadcast
BBC Panorama broadcast undercover footage from Brook House IRC.
05 Nov 2019
Chair Appointed
Kate Eves appointed as Chair.
13 Feb 2020
Terms of Reference Set
Inquiry to examine treatment of detainees April-August 2017.
Source
01 Nov 2021
Hearings Begin
Public hearings commenced.
19 Sep 2023
Final Report Published
Report found "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" of detainees.
Source
19 Sep 2024
One Year Progress Update
Home Office published progress update one year after report.
Costs Click to expand
Total Inquiry Cost
£284,998
Sum of annual reports
Cost Breakdown (to Mar 2020)
Inquiry Legal Costs
£72,643
Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs
-
Legal funding for core participants
Panel
£26,263
Staff
£49,294
Other
£136,798
Verbatim: 'As part of the Inquiry's commitment to transparency, it publishes details of its expenditure. The table below covers total expenditure from 5 November (when the Inquiry was announced) up to 31 March 2020.' 'The information in this report sets out the expenditure for the period 5 November 2019 to 31 March 2020, totalling £284,998. Costs are recorded on a resource basis and audited by the National Audit Office as part of the sponsoring Department accounts.' Table A: Costs — Chair £26,263; Inquiry staffing, including secretariat £49,294; Inquiry legal costs (solicitor, counsel and legal team) £72,643; Core participant and witness costs 'See notes below'; Running costs, including accommodation and IT £114,829; Consultancy and specialist services £21,969; TOTAL COSTS £284,998. Notes on costs (verbatim): 'These figures cover expenditure where invoices have been processed and accruals for the reporting period.' 'The final costs of the Inquiry will be published at the close of the Inquiry once all invoices have been received and settled. The categories in the table may expand during the progress of the Inquiry.' 'The Inquiry is directly funding its own legal team and all such costs are listed under the third row above, with the costs relating to the Chair included in the first row.' 'Core Participant and Witness costs: The Opening Hearing for the Inquiry took place on 21 April 2020. Expenditure relating to core participants or witnesses was not invoiced in the reporting period covered in this report and is therefore not included in the Inquiry's costs for this reporting period. The Inquiry will publish these figures in its 20/21 quarterly budget reports. Expenditure relating to core participants or witnesses to the Inquiry is made per the cost award protocol.' 'The Inquiry's costs are met by the Home Office who sponsor the Inquiry.' SOURCE ACCESS NOTE: the catalogued live URL (cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/...) returns HTTP 403 AccessDenied when fetched directly; this document was recovered via an Internet Archive Wayback Machine replay (captured 2023-10-15) and source_url points to that replay. MAPPING: panel_remuneration = Chair (£26,263). staff_costs = Inquiry staffing, including secretariat (£49,294). inquiry_legal_costs = Inquiry legal costs (solicitor, counsel and legal team) (£72,643), confirmed by the report's own note that 'The Inquiry is directly funding its own legal team and all such costs are listed under the third row above'. core_participant_legal_costs = 0: the table prints no figure for 'Core participant and witness costs' (cell reads 'See notes below'), but the notes explicitly state such expenditure 'was not invoiced in the reporting period covered in this report and is therefore not included in the Inquiry's costs for this reporting period' — i.e. nil for this specific period (not merely unstated); the Inquiry says it will publish these figures in its '20/21 quarterly budget reports' instead. accommodation_costs and technology_costs both left EMPTY: 'Running costs, including accommodation and IT' (£114,829) is a single blended line with no sub-breakdown between running costs, accommodation and IT, so it is not split — routed to other_costs in full instead. other_costs = Running costs, including accommodation and IT (£114,829) + Consultancy and specialist services (£21,969) = £136,798. safeguarding_costs left EMPTY: no such line published. All six published Table A rows (with the Core participant row taken as £0 per the notes) sum to exactly £284,998, matching the report's own printed TOTAL COSTS with no residual. BLOCKED (separately, not in this row): the Brook House Inquiry 2023/24 Quarter 2 Financial Report (cloud-platform-e218f50a4812967ba1215eaecede923f.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/sites/29/2023/11/Brook-House-Inquiry-2023-24-Q2-Financial-Statement-20231018.pdf) could not be recovered: the live URL 403s and the Wayback replay (captured 2023-12-17) returned repeated 'Internet Archive: Temporarily Offline' 503 responses and SSL/connection timeouts across multiple honest attempts; no figures for that report are included anywhere in this file.
Recommendations (1)
Prohibit handcuffing behind back while seated
Recommendation
The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that all staff are aware that the technique of handcuffing detained people with their hands behind their back while seated is not permitted, given its association with positional asphyxia.
Read more
Published evidence summary
- In March 2024, the Home Office stated that it had communicated to all IRC and contracted service provider staff that handcuffing behind the back while seated is not permitted (Government Response to the Brook House Inquiry, Home Office, March 2024).
- In December 2025, DSO 11/2025 (Use of Force for Adults in Detention) was published, explicitly prohibiting handcuffs behind the back while seated and citing the association with positional asphyxia, with a reference to the statutory basis in Section 44 of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025 (Detention Services Order 11/2025, Home Office, 19 December 2025).
- In December 2025, DSO 11/2025 (Use of Force for Adults in Detention) was published, explicitly prohibiting handcuffs behind the back while seated and citing the association with positional asphyxia, with a reference to the statutory basis in Section 44 of the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Act 2025 (Detention Services Order 11/2025, Home Office, 19 December 2025).
Home Office
(Primary)
View Details