James Pearson
PFD Report
Historic (No Identified Response)
Ref: 2024-0266
Coroner's Concerns (AI summary)
Lack of documented observations, insufficient doctor staffing for multiple critical patients, and delayed access to blood products hindered timely intervention, contributing to a patient's rapid deterioration and cardiac arrest.
View full coroner's concerns
1. Having had a CT scan at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital on 14th June 2023, James Pearson was diagnosed with severe pelvic injuries, and the Radiologist reported findings which were consistent with an active pelvic bleed.
2. At 03.16, observations were taken, and the Doctor was satisfied that James was maintaining his blood pressure and therefore was not actively bleeding at that time.
3. During the inquest, I heard that James was attached to a monitor, which was taking his observations every 15 minutes. None of these observations, however, were documented. This is of concern, as it is not possible to know at what point James began to decline. I am concerned that lack of proper documented observations could lead to future deaths, as staff will not be able to follow the observation pattern and notice a decline in presentation.
4. At 04.20am, James became more agitated and nurses noted a drop in consciousness. At this point the Major Haemorrhage Protocol was activated at 04.23am, as there was now a suspicion of ongoing bleeding.
5. Whilst waiting for his blood products, James suffered a cardiac arrest at 04.25am
6. told me in evidence that during the time since his last review by a Doctor at 03.16am, and his cardiac arrest at 04.25am, James was not seen by a Doctor, and only Nurses were available in the department. The only Doctor on shift at that time was dealing with another very unwell patient, who also required resuscitation.
7. told me that at the point in time the deterioration in James was noted, sometime between 04.00-04.20am, James should have received fluids, and in his opinion, if he had done so, on the balance of probabilities, he would not have had a cardiac arrest. He added that this was beyond what he would expect a nurse to adduce, however, if the Doctor had been present, he believed this would have been done.
8. I am therefore concerned that there were not enough Doctors in the department at the time, meaning that there is no resilience to deal effectively with more than one very unwell patient at any given time. If this is not addressed, there is a risk of future deaths.
9. I further heard from that the blood products at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital are not kept in the ED, and are kept some distance away, and could take up to 20 minutes to obtain after the major haemorrhage protocol is activated. Whilst this is unlikely to have affected the outcome for James, due to his sudden deterioration, I am concerned that a delay in obtaining blood products could lead to future deaths.
2. At 03.16, observations were taken, and the Doctor was satisfied that James was maintaining his blood pressure and therefore was not actively bleeding at that time.
3. During the inquest, I heard that James was attached to a monitor, which was taking his observations every 15 minutes. None of these observations, however, were documented. This is of concern, as it is not possible to know at what point James began to decline. I am concerned that lack of proper documented observations could lead to future deaths, as staff will not be able to follow the observation pattern and notice a decline in presentation.
4. At 04.20am, James became more agitated and nurses noted a drop in consciousness. At this point the Major Haemorrhage Protocol was activated at 04.23am, as there was now a suspicion of ongoing bleeding.
5. Whilst waiting for his blood products, James suffered a cardiac arrest at 04.25am
6. told me in evidence that during the time since his last review by a Doctor at 03.16am, and his cardiac arrest at 04.25am, James was not seen by a Doctor, and only Nurses were available in the department. The only Doctor on shift at that time was dealing with another very unwell patient, who also required resuscitation.
7. told me that at the point in time the deterioration in James was noted, sometime between 04.00-04.20am, James should have received fluids, and in his opinion, if he had done so, on the balance of probabilities, he would not have had a cardiac arrest. He added that this was beyond what he would expect a nurse to adduce, however, if the Doctor had been present, he believed this would have been done.
8. I am therefore concerned that there were not enough Doctors in the department at the time, meaning that there is no resilience to deal effectively with more than one very unwell patient at any given time. If this is not addressed, there is a risk of future deaths.
9. I further heard from that the blood products at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital are not kept in the ED, and are kept some distance away, and could take up to 20 minutes to obtain after the major haemorrhage protocol is activated. Whilst this is unlikely to have affected the outcome for James, due to his sudden deterioration, I am concerned that a delay in obtaining blood products could lead to future deaths.
Sent To
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation
Response Status
Linked responses
0 of 1
56-Day Deadline
9 Jul 2024
About PFD responses
Organisations named in PFD reports must respond within 56 days explaining what actions they are taking.
Source: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Report Sections
Investigation and Inquest
On 9 November 2023 I commenced an investigation into the death of James Patrick PEARSON. The investigation concluded at the end of the inquest. The conclusion of the inquest was; Died as a result of complications of prolonged hospital admission, in combination with injuries sustained in a road traffic collision, and subsequent hypoxic brain injury, following cardiac arrest.
Circumstances of the Death
On 14th June 2023, James Pearson was hit by a vehicle on A4540 Birmingham. He was assessed at the scene and his injuries did not appear to be serious. He was taken to Birmingham Heartlands Hospital where a CT scan showed an axonal brain injury, small bleed to the brain, and severe pelvic injuries with suspicion of an active bleed. Observations taken at 03.16 indicated that he was maintaining his blood pressure and the Consultant at the time did not feel he was actively bleeding. James went into peri-arrest, and subsequently suffered a cardiac arrest. After 12 minutes of CPR, a return of spontaneous circulation was achieved, however, James had suffered hypoxic brain injury as a result of the cardiac arrest. This, alongside the traumatic brain injury sustained in the road traffic collision resulted in a prolonged stay in hospital for James, who continued to decline, and developed hospital acquired pneumonia. He was transferred to St Catherine's Hospice in Preston on 12th October 2023 for end of life care, and he passed away there on 22nd October 2023. Whilst at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital an opportunity to provide fluids to James was missed, which, on the balance of probabilities would have prevented his cardiac arrest and subsequent hypoxic brain injury. Following a post mortem, the medical cause of death was determined to be: 1a Pneumonia 1b Diffuse axonal injury and hypoxic brain injury 1c Road traffic collision II Malnutrition
Similar PFD Reports
Reports sharing organisations, categories, or themes
Related Inquiry Recommendations
Public inquiry recommendations addressing similar themes
IPC role specifications and staffing levels
Scottish Hospitals Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Hepatologist Oversight and Fibroscan Access
Infected Blood Inquiry
Delayed Recognition of Deterioration
Resolve paramedic-driver shortage in mass casualties
Manchester Arena Inquiry
Chronic healthcare staff shortages
Data sourced from Courts and Tribunals Judiciary under the Open Government Licence.