Railway related deaths
PFD Category
Reports: 103
Areas: 39
Earliest: Nov 2013
Latest: 5 Feb 2026
72% response rate (above 62% average). 36% of classified responses show concrete action taken. Reports fell 30% from 10 (2023) to 7 (2024).
PFD Reports
103 resultsGeorge Dicker
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0083
13 Mar 2017
London (North)
RSSB
Concerns summary
There is no alarm or warning system to alert railway signallers when a person accesses the tracks via a gate at the end of a platform.
Derek Thomas
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0016
27 Jan 2017
Hampshire (North East)
HM Principal Inspector of Railways
Concerns summary
The unmanned and unprotected railway crossing relies solely on a distant train horn for warning, with previously obscured visibility contributing to safety risks.
Thomas Coyne
Historic (No Identified Response)
2017-0207
19 Jan 2017
Cheshire
Northern Rail
Concerns summary
Inadequate CCTV coverage at the station and the absence of physical barriers at platform ends allowed unmonitored access to the tracks, posing a serious safety risk.
Lauris Kodors
Historic (No Identified Response)
2016-0357
13 Sep 2016
London (North)
RSSB
Concerns summary
The RSSB Rule Book inadequately permits stopping trains only when a person threatens damage to the train, not when a person is in danger from an approaching train.
Stephen Cahill
All Responded
2016-0304
23 Aug 2016
Bedfordshire and Luton
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Easy access to the railway line through inadequate fencing and an access gate poses a risk, and a recommended review of these security measures has not been carried out.
Susan Hamlett
All Responded
2016-wp25372
4 Aug 2016
Bedfordshire and Luton
Network Rail
Richard Hinchliffe
Historic (No Identified Response)
2016-0234
24 Jun 2016
London Inner (South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Concerns include inadequate security of railway platform barriers and a lack of monitoring for a passenger asleep on the platform for an extended period at a 24-hour staffed station.
Michael Younghusband
All Responded
2016-0235
23 Jun 2016
Exeter and Greater Devon
Great Western Railway
Concerns summary
A railway crossing point was in a poor state, with a section standing proud of the track, presenting a significant tripping hazard for users.
Anna Masson
All Responded
2016-0108
15 Mar 2016
Central Hampshire
Southern Health NHS Foundation Trust
Concerns summary
A new mental health referral screening pathway, conducted by junior staff, may not be robust enough to identify urgent cases, and there is inconsistent practice across the Trust's mental health teams.
Jakovas Fofonovas
All Responded
2016-0077
26 Feb 2016
London Inner (South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Safety recommendations from a British Transport Police report to restrict public access and enhance safety at a railway bridge remained unaddressed by the time of the inquest.
Ashley Matthews
All Responded
2015-0297
23 Jul 2015
Black Country
British Transport Police
Concerns summary
Insecure perimeter fencing allowed unauthorized access to the railway site, and there was a lack of warning signs for high voltage cabling on the bridge.
Adam Connelly
Partially Responded
2015-0284
17 Jul 2015
Manchester (West)
Network Rail
British Transport Police
Concerns summary
The low height of walls accessing a railway footbridge allowed easy public access to tracks, creating a significant risk of future fatalities that Network Rail needs to address.
Lewis Ghessen
Historic (No Identified Response)
2015-0213
9 Jun 2015
London (North)
Rail Safety and Standards Board
Concerns summary
The RSSB Rule Book is flawed as it only permits stopping trains to prevent damage, not to protect individuals in danger from a train.
Matthew Hoare
All Responded
2015-0203
27 May 2015
London (Inner South)
National Rail
Concerns summary
Ineffective security equipment allowed easy access to the station and tracks after operational hours, with individuals able to climb through widely spaced yellow tape.
Elliott Bignall
Historic (No Identified Response)
2015-0111
23 Mar 2015
West Sussex
Network Rail
Concerns summary
The railway foot crossing was poorly lit with inadequate signage, posing a danger to pedestrians who might not see or hear approaching high-speed trains, especially if distracted.
Aaron Plowman
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0411
19 Sep 2014
London (Inner South)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Unblocked access points to commercial unit roofs under railway arches allow unauthorized persons to climb from the street, posing a safety risk.
William France
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0409
18 Sep 2014
Somerset (West)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Railway crossing barriers malfunctioned due to a single-arm treddle, causing long delays. Drivers also faced obstructed visibility and a poorly located emergency telephone.
Anthony Ponting
All Responded
2014-0332
8 Jul 2014
Somerset (West)
Network Rail
Emma Lifsey
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0204
7 May 2014
Nottinghamshire
Network Rail
Concerns summary
Outdated, dim level crossing lights, inadequate research into sun glare, and a dangerously slow pace of upgrading equipment pose a significant ongoing risk to safety.
Malcolm Potter
Historic (No Identified Response)
2014-0082
27 Feb 2014
Cambridgeshire (South & West)
Network Rail
Concerns summary
The pedestrian crossing's warning light system is inadequately positioned and not synchronized for multiple trains, creating a significant re-crossing risk on a busy commuter line.
Daniel Maurice McMahon
Partially Responded
2013-0271
21 Nov 2013
London
Department of Health and Social Care
Metropolitan Police
LAS Legal Services
+1 more
Concerns summary
Concerns include inadequate police information gathering for railway trespassers, lack of a feedback form for MHA S17 leave, and an outdated railway rule book concerning stopping trains for unwell individuals on tracks.
Action taken summary
The London Ambulance Service disputes the concern regarding the use of needle chest decompressions without a valve, stating that a review by their Medical Director concluded their current practice is
Andrew Phrydas
Historic (No Identified Response)
2013-0301
15 Nov 2013
London Inner North
London Underground
Concerns summary
London Underground lacked a process for simultaneous dual-line shutdown at intersecting stations and failed to alert the train driver directly and effectively when a person was on the track.
James Herbertson
All Responded
2021-0078
West Sussex
Concerns summary
Inadequate discharge planning from a mental health hospital, including poor communication and unsuitable accommodation, left a vulnerable patient without proper support.
Action taken summary
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust has revised its Care Programme Approach policy to mandate a 3-day follow-up post-discharge and requires a signed discharge plan. They have also delivered traini
Samantha Gould and Christine Gould
All Responded
2021-0184
Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Concerns summary
Police lacked follow-up with clinicians/parents and failed to inform mentally ill child abuse victims about their option to provide evidence later. There was no guidance for police on communicating with such vulnerable minors.
Action taken summary
The NPCC has identified a gap in their national Authorised Professional Practice (APP) and has agreed an immediate addition to the 'Care and Support of Victims and Witnesses' guidance. This new guidan
Croydon Tram Incident
All Responded
2021-0337
South London
Concerns summary
The absence of a centrally funded national tram safety passenger group creates a significant systemic oversight for public safety.
Action taken summary
The Department for Transport notes that the LRSSB has published guidance on driver inattention and speed management, and all tram networks in England now subscribe to CIRAS. The DfT is consulting with