Twenty-Sixth Report - Lessons from Greensill Capital: accreditation to business support schemes

Select Committee
Public Accounts Committee HC 169 20 November 2021
Report Status Government responded
Conclusions & Recommendations 28 items (9 recs)
Government Response (AI assessment · 28 of 28 classified)
Government response
Treasury minutes: Government response to the Committee of Public Accounts on the Twenty Sixth report from Session 2021-22 · published 21 Jan 2022

Recommendations & Conclusions

28 results
2 Recommendation Not Addressed
The Department and the Bank struck the wrong balance between making decisions quickly and protecting...
Recommendation
The Department and the Bank struck the wrong balance between making decisions quickly and protecting taxpayer interests. We have previously found that the need to work at speed in responding to the pandemic has in some instances resulted in increased … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the conclusion but the response focuses on the Department's existing value for money assessment processes and commitment to improve future reporting transparency, rather than the Bank outlining its plan for balancing speed and value as requested.
HM Treasury
View Details
3 Recommendation Not Addressed
The Bank’s approach to due diligence in accrediting Greensill was woefully inadequate.
Recommendation
The Bank’s approach to due diligence in accrediting Greensill was woefully inadequate. The Bank took comfort in Greensill having raised significant funding from global investors and its activities in managing billions of pounds in lending. In doing so, the Bank … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response discusses general supplier performance management, cost assurance, and risk apportionment in contracts, with a commitment to write to the Committee on these topics by May 2022, but does not address the specific recommendation for the Bank to review its accreditation process for non-bank lenders by February 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
4 Recommendation Not Addressed
The Bank has been insufficiently curious when identifying where money lent through the schemes, including...
Recommendation
The Bank has been insufficiently curious when identifying where money lent through the schemes, including by Greensill, has ultimately gone. Companies have borrowed around £30 billion under CBILS and CLBILS. The schemes’ rules require these funds be used to support … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response discusses cost savings and project delivery within the Ministry of Defence, entirely failing to address the recommendation regarding the Bank's monitoring of funds lent under COVID-19 business support schemes.
HM Treasury
View Details
5 Recommendation Accepted
We are concerned that the Bank’s investigation into Greensill has progressed much more slowly than...
Recommendation
We are concerned that the Bank’s investigation into Greensill has progressed much more slowly than we would expect given the seriousness of the potential breach. The Bank launched an investigation into Greensill on 12 October 2020, 10 days after discovering … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, stating the Bank has already informed the Committee of the expected completion timeframe (early months of 2022) for its Greensill investigation and will inform them again upon conclusion.
HM Treasury
View Details
6 Recommendation Not Addressed
The Department’s enquiries of the Bank during Greensill’s accreditation created a damaging perception of interference,...
Recommendation
The Department’s enquiries of the Bank during Greensill’s accreditation created a damaging perception of interference, though the Bank asserts that this did not affect its judgement. The Department had eight email exchanges with the Bank between April and September 2020 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response discusses defence funding, the Integrated Review, and the formation of the UK Health Security Agency, entirely failing to address the recommendation on establishing principles for correspondence with the Bank or cross-government principles for arms-length bodies.
HM Treasury
View Details
7 Recommendation Accepted
Government has not yet identified the lessons it will take from its accreditation of Greensill...
Recommendation
Government has not yet identified the lessons it will take from its accreditation of Greensill or from its COVID-19 business support schemes. Our work over the last 18 months has shown that the scale and nature of the COVID-19 pandemic … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, committing to a multi-year evaluation of the COVID-19 loan schemes and aiming to publish a lessons-learned report by Summer 2022, with further evaluation reports released annually until 2024.
HM Treasury
View Details
1 Conclusion Acknowledged
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence...
Conclusion
On the basis of a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General, we took evidence from HM Treasury (the Treasury), the Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (the Department), and the British Business Bank (the Bank) about the involvement … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government provides a detailed overview of the COVID-19 business support schemes and Greensill's involvement, acknowledging the context for the Committee's report.
HM Treasury
View Details
8 Conclusion Not Addressed
The Bank accredited Greensill to lend under both CBILS and CLBILS.
Conclusion
The Bank accredited Greensill to lend under both CBILS and CLBILS. As Greensill was not PRA regulated nor did it have a pre-existing relationship with the Bank, it was initially 6 Qq 17, 19; C&AG’s Report para 2, 2.4 7 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government response consists of boilerplate text listing relevant reports and does not engage with the committee's conclusion regarding the Bank's accreditation of Greensill or its due diligence process.
HM Treasury
View Details
9 Conclusion Accepted
We asked the Bank how much weight it had placed on the work of others,...
Conclusion
We asked the Bank how much weight it had placed on the work of others, such as Greensill’s auditors, Saffery Champness, in its decision to accredit Greensill. The Bank told us that the auditor’s opinion about the financial health of … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states the Bank will write to the Committee by end of February 2022, detailing accreditation processes reviewed and adjusted for the Recovery Loan Scheme, and will continue to keep these processes under review for future programmes.
HM Treasury
View Details
10 Conclusion Accepted
We asked the Bank why it had accredited Greensill despite several press reports highlighting it...
Conclusion
We asked the Bank why it had accredited Greensill despite several press reports highlighting it had a string of its clients default on their debt, potentially damaging Greensill. The Bank told us that it discussed the losses with Greensill and … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states the Bank will write to the Committee by end of February 2022, detailing accreditation processes reviewed and adjusted prior to the launch of the Recovery Loan Scheme, and will continue to keep its accreditation process under review for future programmes.
HM Treasury
View Details
11 Conclusion Acknowledged
The NAO found that the Bank treated Greensill’s application like other similar applicants, but that...
Conclusion
The NAO found that the Bank treated Greensill’s application like other similar applicants, but that the Department was particularly interested in Greensill’s accreditation. The Bank applied the same accreditation and due diligence process to Greensill as it did to the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the committee's point and is updating the Shareholder Relationship Framework Document, as part of which it will consider changes regarding operational independence and departmental correspondence with the Bank. It will inform the Committee of the outcome of its considerations.
HM Treasury
View Details
12 Conclusion Acknowledged
The Department told us that it had requested updates on when a decision would be...
Conclusion
The Department told us that it had requested updates on when a decision would be made about accrediting Greensill so that it could decide whether it needed to create a “separate bespoke solution … [if] the process was ultimately going … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the committee's point and is updating the Shareholder Relationship Framework Document, as part of which it will consider changes regarding operational independence and departmental correspondence with the Bank. It will inform the Committee of the outcome of its considerations.
HM Treasury
View Details
13 Conclusion Deferred
The NAO found that, when challenged on its loans to borrowers within the GFG Alliance...
Conclusion
The NAO found that, when challenged on its loans to borrowers within the GFG Alliance group, Greensill told the Bank that it had received “political steers” that its support for the steel industry was welcomed.34 We asked the Department what … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states its Shareholder Relationship Framework Document is being updated, and consideration will be given to changes regarding operational independence for 'Service Arm' activities, with a commitment to write to the Committee on the outcome.
HM Treasury
View Details
14 Conclusion Deferred
We asked the Bank whether it considered the Department’s questions about Greensill’s accreditation as the...
Conclusion
We asked the Bank whether it considered the Department’s questions about Greensill’s accreditation as the Department encouraging the approval of Greensill’s application. The Bank told us that it had considered the level of interest from the Department as “unusual”, but … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that its Shareholder Relationship Framework Document is being updated, and consideration will be given to changes regarding operational independence for 'Service Arm' activities, with a commitment to write to the Committee on the outcome.
HM Treasury
View Details
15 Recommendation Accepted
In early 2020, Greensill approached a number of government departments seeking involvement in various business...
Recommendation
In early 2020, Greensill approached a number of government departments seeking involvement in various business support schemes.41 Greensill approached the Treasury and the Bank of England to access the Covid Corporate Finance Facility (CCFF) and was rejected as it was … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, stating BEIS has already raised the importance of cross-government information sharing and will work with Cabinet Office and HM Treasury to develop existing processes where necessary.
HM Treasury
View Details
16 Conclusion Accepted
We were concerned that Greensill had approached various parts of government looking for financial support,...
Conclusion
We were concerned that Greensill had approached various parts of government looking for financial support, with different decision-makers arriving at conclusions in isolation and without engaging with officials in other departments. For example, the Bank told us that it was … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and states the recommendation is implemented. BEIS will work closely with Cabinet Office and HM Treasury to develop existing processes for sharing company information across government departments and public bodies, while respecting commercial and legal restrictions.
HM Treasury
View Details
17 Conclusion Accepted
In May 2020, the Bank of England shared information with the Treasury that it had...
Conclusion
In May 2020, the Bank of England shared information with the Treasury that it had raised concerns with the National Crime Agency about Wyelands Bank. Wyelands Bank is a part of the GFG Alliance which was a significant Greensill client.48 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the importance of information sharing, stating that BEIS has written to the Committee, currently facilitates data sharing, and will work closely with Cabinet Office and HM Treasury to develop existing processes where necessary.
HM Treasury
View Details
18 Conclusion Acknowledged
Greensill lent a total of £418.5 million under the government’s COVID-19 business support schemes between...
Conclusion
Greensill lent a total of £418.5 million under the government’s COVID-19 business support schemes between July and October 2020. Of this, Greensill lent £400 million under CLBILS, the maximum amount it was authorised to lend, through eight loans of £50 … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the committee's finding by reiterating the total amounts Greensill lent under CLBILS and CBILS.
HM Treasury
View Details
19 Conclusion Acknowledged
On 12 October 2020, the Bank launched an investigation into Greensill’s compliance with the CLBILS...
Conclusion
On 12 October 2020, the Bank launched an investigation into Greensill’s compliance with the CLBILS scheme rules. This was 10 days after the Bank first noticed that Greensill had made six CLBILS loans on 30 September to companies associated with … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government confirms that the Bank launched an investigation in October 2020 into Greensill's compliance with CLBILS rules due to concerns over £350 million lent to GFG Alliance companies, which appeared to contravene the £50 million group lending cap.
HM Treasury
View Details
20 Conclusion Acknowledged
The Bank told us that it had acted immediately to protect the taxpayers’ position by...
Conclusion
The Bank told us that it had acted immediately to protect the taxpayers’ position by preventing Greensill from making any further loans under the schemes.56 The Bank engaged Ernst & Young (EY) between October 2020 and March 2021 to examine … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government acknowledges the Bank's actions, stating the loan guarantees remain suspended during the ongoing investigation and outlining the potential maximum liability if the guarantee is reinstated.
HM Treasury
View Details
21 Conclusion Accepted
In the Letter of Concern, the Bank outlined what it considered to be breaches of...
Conclusion
In the Letter of Concern, the Bank outlined what it considered to be breaches of the guarantee agreement. In the Letter, the Bank also suspended the guarantee while the investigation was ongoing and invited representations from Greensill.59 We asked the … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states the Bank has written to the Committee on 17 December 2021 and will inform them when its investigation into Greensill's lending concludes, expected in early 2022, prioritizing a thorough and informed decision.
HM Treasury
View Details
22 Recommendation Accepted
The Bank confirmed that the investigation was still ongoing as it was awaiting a formal...
Recommendation
The Bank confirmed that the investigation was still ongoing as it was awaiting a formal response from Greensill’s joint administrators. The Bank explained that it had agreed to extend the deadline for Greensill’s response to August 2021 because it wanted … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation, confirming the Bank's investigation into Greensill's lending prioritises thoroughness over speed, and expects to inform the Committee of the outcome in the early months of 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
23 Conclusion Accepted
In total, under CBILS and CLBILS, lenders have issued more than 110,000 loans worth around...
Conclusion
In total, under CBILS and CLBILS, lenders have issued more than 110,000 loans worth around £30 billion.68 Part of the eligibility criteria for receiving a loan included borrowers having its business activity based in the UK.69 The Treasury, which was … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states that existing scheme rules, lender processes, and the Bank's audit assurance programme, including testing UK eligibility criteria, are in place to ensure loans support UK businesses, with measures available for non-compliance.
HM Treasury
View Details
24 Conclusion Accepted
To understand how the Bank ensures that these schemes support UK businesses, we asked about...
Conclusion
To understand how the Bank ensures that these schemes support UK businesses, we asked about the barriers that were in place for preventing the offshoring of the taxpayer- guaranteed loans. The Bank responded that a requirement of the scheme was … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees and states the recommendation is implemented, explaining that existing scheme rules require loans to benefit UK operations and the British Business Bank's audit programme already tests lenders' compliance with UK eligibility criteria.
HM Treasury
View Details
25 Conclusion Accepted
We asked the Treasury and the Bank whether they had undertaken any analysis of how...
Conclusion
We asked the Treasury and the Bank whether they had undertaken any analysis of how the £350 million loaned to GFG Alliance companies was used, or in which country the money was spent. The Bank told us it was aware … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government states it agrees with 'the recommendation' (though the item is a conclusion) and describes existing scheme rules for CBILS/CLBILS, lender control requirements, and the Bank's audit assurance programme to ensure compliance, implying these processes address concerns about loan usage and eligibility.
HM Treasury
View Details
26 Conclusion Accepted
Our work on the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that there are...
Conclusion
Our work on the government’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic has demonstrated that there are important lessons to be learnt to improve government’s ability to respond to future emergencies and its business-as-usual service delivery. In 2021, as part of our … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government commits to learning lessons from COVID-19 loan schemes through a multi-year evaluation with reports published annually between 2022 and 2024, and aims to produce a lessons-learned report by Summer 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details
27 Conclusion Not Addressed
We asked what lessons had been learnt or what could have been done differently as...
Conclusion
We asked what lessons had been learnt or what could have been done differently as a result of Greensill’s access to these taxpayer-backed schemes. The Treasury told us that it wanted to review all the reports and inquiries, such as … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government's response states it agrees with 'the recommendation' and commits to a multi-year evaluation of COVID-19 loan schemes and publishing a lessons-learned report by Summer 2022, but this does not directly address the committee's conclusion outlining what the Treasury had *said* about reviewing reports.
HM Treasury
View Details
28 Recommendation Accepted
The Bank told us that it will closely evaluate its COVID-19 business support schemes, including...
Recommendation
The Bank told us that it will closely evaluate its COVID-19 business support schemes, including assessing whether there were things it would need “to do differently” with the accreditation processes going forward and more specifically whether there could have been … Read more
Government Response Summary
The government agrees with the recommendation to evaluate the COVID-19 loan schemes, confirming a multi-year evaluation is underway with reports due between 2022-2024, and commits to producing an interim lessons-learned report by Summer 2022.
HM Treasury
View Details