Previous Next
Jump to 3 Recommendations

Edinburgh Tram Inquiry

Completed
Chair Lord Hardie Judge / Judiciary
Established 01 Oct 2014
Final Report 12 Sep 2023
Commissioned by Scottish Government

Public inquiry into why the Edinburgh Trams project was delivered late, over budget, and with a reduced scope. The project cost £776m against an original estimate of £375m and took 5 years longer than planned.

Evidence & Impact
The Edinburgh Tram Inquiry, chaired by Lord Hardie, examined the planning and construction of Edinburgh's tram system, which experienced significant cost overruns and delays. The inquiry published 24 recommendations in August 2023 focusing on project governance, management practices, and legal reforms.

The Scottish Government accepted 14 recommendations (58%), accepted 7 in principle (29%), and placed 3 under consideration (12%). In its November 2023 response, the Government stated that enhanced procedures for documentation management had been embedded within government and that guidance for establishing inquiries was already in development. The Government noted its commitment to collaborative working through the Verity House agreement, whilst maintaining that responsibility for project delivery remains with councils.

City of Edinburgh Council's Chief Executive reported to the Transport and Environment Committee in November 2023, recommending acceptance of several recommendations. Council Leader Cammy Day acknowledged that "serious mistakes were made in the construction of the original tram line" and noted that processes implemented since the original project had helped deliver the successful Trams to Newhaven extension.

The Council reported that scrutiny of ALEOs had "significantly improved" following reviews in 2012 and 2016, resulting in formalised observer roles and increased committee scrutiny. Training on the Member/Officer Protocol was being delivered to senior officers to clarify the distinction between officer and councillor roles.

Three recommendations regarding civil damages provisions and criminal offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by the Scottish Government, which noted that existing remedies may already exist under delictual liability and fraud law.

Whilst both the Scottish Government and City of Edinburgh Council provided initial responses accepting most recommendations, published evidence of specific implementation actions remains limited for many recommendations, particularly those relating to project management expertise requirements, governance structures, and stakeholder co-location practices.
Reforms Attributed to This Inquiry
- Enhanced procedures for minute-taking and documentation management embedded within Scottish Government and Civil Service (Scottish Government statement, November 2023)
- Improved scrutiny arrangements for Arms Length External Organisations (ALEOs) by City of Edinburgh Council, including formalised observer roles and regular committee reporting following 2012 and 2016 reviews
- Member/Officer Protocol training delivered to senior officers at City of Edinburgh Council to clarify distinction between officer and councillor roles
- Guidance for efficient establishment of inquiries developed and shared with recent inquiries (Scottish Government statement, November 2023)
Unfinished Business
- Recommendations on civil damages provisions and criminal statutory offences for misleading evidence to inquiries remain under consideration by Scottish Government
- No published evidence of action on recommendations regarding project management expertise requirements for light rail projects
- No published evidence of progress on recommendations for governance structure guidance and role clarity in major projects
- No published evidence regarding recommendations on co-location of project stakeholders
- No published evidence of updates to guidance on best practices for light rail delivery, despite Scottish Government stating it already operates in line with best practices
AI-generated narrative. Generated 26 Mar 2026 using claude-opus-4. Assessment is indicative, not authoritative.
8 years, 10 months Duration
£13.2m Total Cost
100 Witnesses
160 Hearing Days
7 Core Participants
6,000,000 Documents
961 Report Pages
Inquiry Website Terms of Reference
Government Response
Accepted 14
Accepted in Part 7
Under Review 3
Total Recommendations 24
Data last updated: 16 Nov 2023 · Source
Data verified: 26 May 2026 (import)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

Title Volume Publication Date Tracked recs Links
Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report Final Report 01 Aug 2023 24
05 Jun 2014
Inquiry Announced

Scottish Ministers established an inquiry into the Edinburgh Tram Project.

Source
03 Jul 2014
Chair Appointed

Lord Hardie appointed as Chair.

08 Sep 2014
Terms of Reference Set

Inquiry to examine why project was delayed and over budget.

09 Mar 2017
Hearings Begin

Evidence hearings commenced.

12 Sep 2023
Final Report Published

Report published with 24 recommendations.

Source
31 Jan 2024
Government Response

Scottish Government response to recommendations.

Clear

Recommendations (3)

ETI-22
Under Consideration
Civil Sanctions for Misleading Reports
Recommendation
Where a company, including an ALEO, knowingly submits a report or other information to local authority officials that is misleading by reason of the inclusion of false statements or the omission of relevant facts, or where such officials knowingly submit … Read more
Published evidence summary
- In November 2023, the Scottish Government stated it was "giving careful consideration" to the recommendations about civil damages provisions for misleading evidence, noting that existing remedies may already exist under delictual law (Transport Secretary Statement on Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report, Scottish Government, 2 November 2023).
- No published decision on whether to introduce new civil liability provisions for knowingly submitting misleading reports or information has been identified to March 2026.
Scottish Government (Primary)
View Details
ETI-23
Under Consideration
Criminal Sanctions for Misleading Information
Recommendation
In addition to civil liability from any sanction introduced in accordance with Recommendation 22, Scottish Ministers should consider whether there is need for a statutory criminal offence involving strict liability once it is established that information or reports were misleading … Read more
Published evidence summary
- In November 2023, the Scottish Government stated it was "giving careful consideration" to the recommendations about criminal statutory offences for misleading evidence, noting that existing remedies may already exist (Transport Secretary Statement on Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report, Scottish Government, 2 November 2023).
- No published decision on whether to introduce a statutory criminal offence of strict liability for submitting misleading information or reports has been identified to March 2026.
Scottish Government (Primary)
View Details
ETI-24
Under Consideration
Duty of Disclosure Legislation
Recommendation
Scottish Ministers should consider the need for legislation to impose a similar duty of disclosure to that owed by policyholders to their insurers upon a company, its directors, employees or consultants and upon a local authority and its officials towards … Read more
Published evidence summary
- In November 2023, the Scottish Government stated it was "giving careful consideration" to the recommendations about provisions for misleading evidence (Transport Secretary Statement on Edinburgh Tram Inquiry Report, Scottish Government, 2 November 2023).
- No published decision on whether to introduce legislation imposing a duty of disclosure upon companies, directors, and local authority officials towards audit and review bodies has been identified to March 2026.
Scottish Government (Primary)
View Details