Southport Inquiry

Inquiry into the 29 July 2024 Southport knife attack by Axel Rudakubana at a children's Taylor Swift dance class, which killed three girls: Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar, and injured ten others.

Read the full description

Inquiry into the 29 July 2024 Southport knife attack by Axel Rudakubana at a children's Taylor Swift dance class, which killed three girls: Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe and Alice da Silva Aguiar, and injured ten others. Phase 1 report published 13 April 2026, making 67 recommendations across policing, social care, education, healthcare, Prevent, weapons/online harms. Phase 2 will examine children drawn into extreme violence.

Where it stands

Public hearings have been held on 53 days, most recently on 22 October 2026. The Southport Inquiry Report: Phase 1 was published on 13 April 2026. The most recent government response on the record is Government Response to Phase 1 of the Southport Inquiry, dated 2 July 2026.

ChairSir Adrian FulfordJudge / Judiciary
Commissioned byHome Office
Established7 Apr 2025
Duration so far1 year, 6 months
Latest period’s cost£6.2m
Announced 21 Jan 2025
Inquiry established 7 Apr 2025
Hearings 8 Jul 2025 · 53 sitting days
Phase 1 report 13 Apr 2026
Recommendations 67 tracked
Inquiry continuing

Reports & recommendations

All 67 recommendations →
67 recommendations

Government response

Latest statement by addressee
No statement from Department for Education found in the sources searched: 10
No statement from Southport Inquiry Phase 2 found in the sources searched: 10; another body’s finding on record for 1
No statement from Lancashire Constabulary found in the sources searched: 7
No statement from Lancashire County Council found in the sources searched: 7
No statement from Home Office found in the sources searched: 6
Lancashire County Council says in progress: 5; another body’s finding on record for 1
No statement from Counter Terrorism Policing found in the sources searched: 4
No statement from Department of Health and Social Care found in the sources searched: 3
No statement from All police forces found in the sources searched: 2
No statement from Department for Transport found in the sources searched: 2
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust says in progress: 1
No statement from Amazon found in the sources searched: 1
No statement from Department for Science, Innovation and Technology found in the sources searched: 1
No statement from Greater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust found in the sources searched: 1
Home Office says in progress: 1
No statement from Law Commission found in the sources searched: 1; another body’s finding on record for 1
No statement from Merseyside Police found in the sources searched: 1
No statement from Metropolitan Police Service found in the sources searched: 1
No statement from NHS England found in the sources searched: 1
No statement from North West Ambulance Service NHS Trust found in the sources searched: 1
No statement from Youth Justice Board for England and Wales found in the sources searched: 1

"No statement found" means none was found in the sources searched, last checked 2 July 2026. Each figure is the latest statement from the body the recommendation is addressed to. Other bodies’ findings are shown on each recommendation and do not change these figures.


Data last updated: 15 Sep 2026 · Source
Checked against sources: 2 Jul 2026
About the blanket government response

The government's response to Phase 1 (CP 1623, 2 July 2026) agreed with all 67 recommendations in one sentence, and names only 39 of them individually. Where a recommendation is not named, the response shown is the passage the response gives for the group it belongs to (the recommendations for organisations outside central government, or the recommendations to policing bodies), which is not a response to that recommendation alone; the response does not list the members of any group. The 10 recommendations for Phase 2 of the Inquiry to consider show no response: the response introduces them (paragraph 20) but answers none of them. The government accepts the recommendations that are for central government to deliver. Where a recommendation is for an organisation outside central government, the government's agreement is not that organisation's acceptance.

How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

Latest sitting day
22 October 2026
Day outline →

October 2026

Transcript → · Watch →

Latest evidence

All 1110 documents →

Costs

Spent in the latest reported period £6,241,000

The Southport Inquiry Financial Report, 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026

Source and qualifications

Accounting period: 1 Apr 2025 to 31 Mar 2026.

The Southport Inquiry Financial Report, 1 April 2025 – 31 March 2026

Breakdown and notes

Cost breakdown (to Mar 2026)

Inquiry Legal Costs £2,171,000 Panel remuneration & Counsel to the Inquiry
Core Participant Legal Costs £1,273,000 Legal funding for core participants
Panel £173,000
Staff £465,000
Accommodation £341,000
Technology £1,000
Safeguarding £106,000
Other £1,711,000