Brook House Inquiry

Completed
Chair Kate Eves Legal professional (non-judge)
Established 03 Feb 2020
Final Report 19 Sep 2023
Commissioned by Home Office

The Brook House Inquiry examined mistreatment of detainees at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre near Gatwick Airport between April and August 2017, following undercover footage broadcast by BBC Panorama. The inquiry found 19 incidents of mistreatment and made 33 recommendations.

Evidence & Impact
The Brook House Inquiry, chaired by Kate Eves, examined events at Brook House Immigration Removal Centre following undercover filming by BBC Panorama in 2017 that revealed mistreatment of detained people. The inquiry published its final report in September 2023 containing 33 recommendations addressing detention conditions, use of force, healthcare, safeguarding vulnerable detainees, and oversight mechanisms.

The government's response in March 2024 accepted 27 recommendations in principle, accepted one fully, placed two under consideration, and rejected three. The rejected recommendations concerned a 28-day detention time limit, NHS England responsibility for healthcare quality assurance, and changing the seniority of the Professional Standards Unit head. For the 28-day limit, the government stated this would 'significantly impair the ability to remove those who have breached immigration laws'.

According to a parliamentary written answer in January 2025, 17 recommendations were reported as completed and closed as of October 2024, with a further 13 'on track for closure by summer 2025'. Evidence of specific changes includes new contractual requirements for service providers, establishment of Home Office monitoring teams in each IRC, publication of interim guidance on segregation rules, and implementation of a new staffing model.

However, the public record reveals gaps between reported completion and observable outcomes. A High Court ruling in December 2025 found the Home Secretary had failed to comply with Article 3 ECHR duties in Rule 35 safeguarding at Brook House, identifying a 'systemic disconnect' between the Adults at Risk policy and safeguarding processes. HM Inspectorate of Prisons reports from 2025 noted 'Mixed Findings' across several areas despite reported completion of relevant recommendations.

While the government has reported progress through parliamentary questions, limited published evidence exists regarding the substance of many reforms. Several recommendations targeting summer 2025 completion lack subsequent public updates, including the substantive revision of segregation guidance, development of operational standards for use of force on mentally ill detainees, and legislative reform for Independent Monitoring Boards. The inquiry chair described the government's overall response as 'disappointing' in March 2024, though specific reasons were not detailed in the available evidence.
Reforms Attributed to This Inquiry
- New Immigration Removal Centre contracts introduced requiring internal audit programmes and self-reporting by service providers (Official government response, March 2024)
- Establishment of two Home Office teams in each IRC: detention services compliance teams for contract monitoring and Detention Engagement Teams for detainee interaction (Official government response, March 2024)
- Implementation of quarterly Executive Oversight Boards bringing together senior Home Office officials and service provider executives (Official government response, March 2024)
- Publication of interim Detention Services Order clarifying Rule 40 and Rule 42 authorisation protocols (Official government response, March 2024)
- Updated Detention Services Order on food and fluid refusal linking to Rule 35 process and Adults at Risk policy (Official government response, March 2024)
- Implementation of maximum 9-hour overnight lock-in period (Official government response, March 2024)
- New staffing model delivering nearly double the ratio of custodial staff per detained individual compared to 2017 (Official government response, March 2024)
- Full review of Initial Training Course for contractor staff to include mental health awareness, racial awareness, and safeguarding (Official government response, March 2024)
- Professional Standards Unit training updated to incorporate Brook House Inquiry findings (Official government response, March 2024)
Unfinished Business
- Independent review of use of force on people with mental ill health (recommendation 16) - work on operational standards reported but no evidence of independent review commissioned
- Substantive revision of Detention Services Order on Rule 40/42 including staff training and compliance auditing - reported as 'on track for closure by summer 2025' but no completion evidence identified
- Legislative reform to provide Independent Monitoring Boards with statutory framework - commitment made in 2021 Prisons Strategy White Paper but no legislation identified
- Review of Adults at Risk policy and Rules 34 and 35 - reported as 'on track for closure by summer 2025' but High Court found systemic disconnect in December 2025
- Updated guidance on medical complaints and regular training - reported as completed October 2024 but no specific details publicly identified
- Anonymous reporting mechanisms for whistleblowing - reported as 'on track for closure by summer 2025' but no specific details identified
- Evidence gathering and reporting processes for HMIP and IMBs - reported as 'on track for closure by summer 2025' but no specific details identified
Generated 18 Mar 2026 using claude-opus-4. Assessment is indicative, not authoritative.
3 years, 7 months Duration
£20m Total Cost
46 Hearing Days
24 Core Participants
100,000 Documents
Government Response

Total Recommendations 33
Data last updated: 15 Dec 2025 · Source
Data verified: 23 Mar 2026 (import)
How to read this

Government Response tracks what the government said it would do (accepted, rejected, etc.).

Full methodology

1 debate 19 questions 4 statements since Sep 2023
10 Jan 2025
Written Question Immigration: Detainees
The Lord Bishop of Chelmsford (Bishops)
18 Dec 2024
Written Question Migrants: Detainees
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
18 Dec 2024
13 Nov 2024
Written Question Immigration: Detainees
Olivia Blake (Labour)
12 Nov 2024
View all 24 mentions →
Title Volume Publication Date Recs Links
The Brook House Inquiry Report Final Report 19 Sep 2023 33
01 Sep 2017
Panorama Broadcast

BBC Panorama broadcast undercover footage from Brook House IRC.

05 Nov 2019
Inquiry Announced

Home Secretary announced a statutory inquiry.

Source
05 Nov 2019
Chair Appointed

Kate Eves appointed as Chair.

13 Feb 2020
Terms of Reference Set

Inquiry to examine treatment of detainees April-August 2017.

Source
01 Nov 2021
Hearings Begin

Public hearings commenced.

19 Sep 2023
Final Report Published

Report found "cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" of detainees.

Source
22 Nov 2023
Government Response

Home Office published response accepting recommendations.

Source
19 Sep 2024
One Year Progress Update

Home Office published progress update one year after report.

Recommendations (33)

1
Accepted in Part
Monitor Brook House contract performance robustly
Recommendation
The Home Office must actively and robustly monitor the performance of the Brook House contract, including satisfying itself that any self-reported information is accurate. This may include engagement with monitoring bodies and appropriate stakeholders. Penalties must be attached to inadequate … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office introduced new contracts requiring internal audit programmes and self-reporting by service providers, with two Home Office teams operating in each Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) for contract monitoring and detainee interaction. Quarterly Executive Oversight Boards were established to escalate unresolved issues (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was marked as completed and closed as of October 2024 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). An independent review in August 2025 noted increased contact and communication with detainees by the active Home Office team, and that oversight mechanisms were functioning, although more work was needed (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
2
Accepted in Part
Require IRC contracts to uphold Rule 3 humane detention principles
Recommendation
The Home Office must ensure that each contract for the management of an immigration removal centre must expressly require compliance with the overriding purpose of Rule 3, which is to provide "the secure but humane accommodation of detained persons in … Read more
Published evidence summary
New contracts for the management of Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs) mandate adherence to Detention Services Orders, including the Detention Centre Rules 2001, and the Home Office's Detention Services Operations Compliance and Assurance strategy for 2024 onwards was being improved (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was marked as completed and closed as of October 2024 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). However, an independent review in August 2025 found mixed progress, noting rolling refurbishment and an upgraded library created a welcoming space, but cells remained inadequately ventilated with sealed windows (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
3
Accepted in Part
Limit cell occupancy to maximum two people
Recommendation

The Home Office must ensure that a maximum of two detained people are accommodated in each cell at Brook House.

Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that all rooms across the immigration removal estate, including Brook House, meet the standards under Rule 15(1) of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, and that no room designed for two individuals houses more than two, with no plans to change this (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons noted in September 2025 that cells at Brook House remained inadequately ventilated with sealed windows, though this was not directly related to occupancy (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 3 September 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
4
Accepted in Part
Ensure reasonable internet and computer access for detainees
Recommendation
The Home Office and its contractors must ensure reasonable access to computers and the internet. Contractors must comply in full with Detention Services Order 04/2016: Detainee Access to the Internet, in particular: Computers and the internet provided for detained people's … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that service contracts mandate adherence to Detention Services Order 04/2016, which includes the mandatory provision of and regulated access to IT equipment and internet services for detainees, with fines available for non-compliance (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons noted in September 2025 a rolling refurbishment of units and an upgraded library at Brook House, which could facilitate access (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 3 September 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
5
Accepted in Part
Require proper cell sharing risk assessments
Recommendation
The Home Office must ensure that adequate risk assessment for cell sharing is carried out by contractors in relation to every detained person. This must be done at the outset of detention and then repeated at reasonable intervals (at least … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that cell sharing risk assessments are covered under new contractual arrangements with providers, alongside the implementation of a new staffing model (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "due for closure by end of January 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). The Inquiry Chair, Kate Eves, described the government's overall response as "inadequate" in September 2024.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
6
Accepted in Part
Review and reduce cell lock-in periods
Recommendation
The Home Office, in consultation with the contractor responsible for operating each immigration removal centre, must review the current lock-in regime and determine whether the period of time during which detained people are locked in their cells could be reduced. … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that a maximum 9-hour overnight lock-in period has been implemented across the immigration removal estate, alongside a drive to improve the range of activities available to detainees (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons noted in September 2025 an upgraded library and relaxed spaces at Brook House, which could support increased activity (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 3 September 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
7
Not Accepted
Introduce 28-day maximum time limit on detention
Recommendation

The government must introduce in legislation a maximum 28-day time limit on any individual's detention within an immigration removal centre.

Published evidence summary
The government formally rejected the recommendation to introduce a 28-day maximum time limit on immigration detention, stating it would impair the ability to remove individuals who have breached immigration laws (Official government response, March 2024; Written PQ 23170, January 2025). A High Court ruling in July 2025 affirmed that the government was under no legal obligation to comply with inquiry recommendations and that the rejection was a lawful exercise of discretion (R (D1914) v SSHD [2025] EWHC 1853 (Admin)). HM Inspectorate of Prisons reported in September 2025 that 67% of detainees at Brook House were held for over two months, with the longest detention exceeding 550 days, indicating no change in practice regarding detention length.
8
Accepted in Part
Mandatory comprehensive Rule 34 and Rule 35 training
Recommendation
The Home Office (in collaboration with NHS England as required) must ensure that comprehensive training on Rule 34 and Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001 is rolled out urgently across the immigration detention estate. Staff must be subject … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office accepted this recommendation in principle in March 2024, stating it was reviewing the Adults at Risk policy and Detention Centre Rules 34 and 35, with NHS England developing interim clinical guidance for Rule 35 assessments and full training planned after the review (Official government response, March 2024). A Written Parliamentary Question in January 2025 indicated the work was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Written PQ 23170, January 2025). However, an HM Inspectorate of Prisons review in August 2025 (published September 2025) found that Rule 35 appointments were taking up to three weeks, reports for suicidal detainees were routinely not submitted, and Home Office identification of vulnerabilities remained inadequate, indicating that comprehensive training and effective operation are not yet fully established.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
9
Under Consideration
Ensure effective operation and auditing of all Rule 35 limbs
Recommendation
The Home Office must, across the immigration detention estate, assure itself that all three limbs of Rule 35 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001 (reports by a medical practitioner where: (i) it is likely that a detained person's health would … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated in March 2024 that this recommendation was "Under Consideration," noting the existing detention gatekeeper system and Adults at Risk policy, and an ongoing review of the AaR policy and Rules 34 and 35 (Official government response, March 2024). A Written Parliamentary Question in January 2025 indicated the work was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Written PQ 23170, January 2025). However, a High Court ruling in December 2025 found the Home Secretary failed to comply with Article 3 ECHR systems duty in Rule 35 safeguarding at Brook House between July 2023 and March 2024, with only a small number of Rule 35 reports filed despite numerous care plans (AH and IS v SSHD [2025] EWHC 3269 (Admin)). Furthermore, an HM Inspectorate of Prisons review in August 2025 (published September 2025) reported that Rule 35 appointments were taking up to three weeks and there was a routine failure to submit reports for suicidal detainees, indicating a lack of effective operation and auditing.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
10
Under Consideration
Clarify authorisation for Rule 40 and Rule 42 segregation
Recommendation
The Home Office must amend, as a matter of urgency, Detention Services Order 02/2017: Removal from Association (Detention Centre Rule 40) and Temporary Confinement (Detention Centre Rule 42) and, if necessary, the Detention Services Operating Standards Manual for Immigration Service … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office published an interim Detention Services Order (DSO) to clarify authorisation protocols for Rule 40 (removal from association) and Rule 42 (temporary confinement) (Official government response, 19 March 2024). A substantive DSO revision was underway, examining assurance mechanisms, staff training, and compliance auditing, and was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). As of March 2026, the completion of the substantive DSO revision has not been explicitly confirmed. An independent review in August 2025 noted better-resourced welfare and reception services and improved healthcare, but did not specifically address the clarification of Rule 40 and Rule 42 authorisation (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
11
Accepted in Part
Review E Wing suitability for vulnerable detainees
Recommendation

The Home Office and the current operator of Brook House must keep under review the appropriateness of the multi-purpose use of E Wing, particularly in relation to its suitability as a location to detain vulnerable people.

Published evidence summary
The government stated that the multi-purpose use of Eden Wing at Brook House was under consideration, with learning to be applied across the detention estate (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was marked as due for closure by the end of January 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). However, specific details regarding the outcome of the review or any changes made to E Wing's suitability for vulnerable detainees have not been publicly detailed as of March 2026.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
12
Accepted in Part
Annual training on Rule 40 and Rule 42 segregation powers
Recommendation
The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must provide regular training, at least annually, on the operation of Rule 40 and Rule 42 of the Detention Centre Rules 2001, which must include: that Rules 40 and 42 are … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government stated that the substantive Detention Services Order (DSO) revision on Rule 40/42 included an examination of staff training requirements and compliance auditing (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This revision was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). An independent review in August 2025 noted reduced use of force incidents and improved de-escalation practices, suggesting progress in related areas, but did not explicitly confirm the implementation of annual training specifically on Rule 40 and Rule 42 segregation powers (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
13
Accepted in Part
Quarterly auditing of Rule 40 and Rule 42 use
Recommendation
The Home Office must regularly (and at least quarterly) audit the use of Rule 40 and Rule 42 across the immigration detention estate, in order to identify trends, any training needs and required improvements. In addition, HM Inspectorate of Prisons … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government stated that the Detention Services Order (DSO) revision for Rule 40 and Rule 42 included compliance auditing across the detention estate (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This revision was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). As of March 2026, specific evidence of regular (at least quarterly) auditing of Rule 40 and Rule 42 use by the Home Office, HM Inspectorate of Prisons, or the Independent Monitoring Boards has not been publicly detailed.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
14
Accepted
Prohibit handcuffing behind back while seated
Recommendation
The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that all staff are aware that the technique of handcuffing detained people with their hands behind their back while seated is not permitted, given its association with positional asphyxia. Read more
Published evidence summary
The government communicated to all Immigration Removal Centre (IRC) and contracted service provider staff that the technique of handcuffing detained people with their hands behind their back while seated is not permitted (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was marked as completed and closed as of October 2024 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
15
Accepted in Part
New comprehensive use of force detention services order
Recommendation
The Home Office must introduce, as a matter of urgency, a new and comprehensive detention services order to address use of force in immigration removal centres. The detention services order must include the following issues: the permissible justifications for the … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that a new Detention Services Order (DSO) on use of force was being developed in consultation with experts, alongside an overhaul of assurance processes and a new escalation system (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). An independent review in August 2025 noted strengthened staffing levels and capability, with implemented training on a "Monitor, Challenge and Support" process, indicating related improvements in the detention environment (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025). However, the publication of the new comprehensive DSO itself has not been explicitly confirmed as of March 2026.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
16
Accepted in Part
Independent review of use of force on mentally ill detainees
Recommendation
The Home Office must urgently commission an independent review (with the power to make recommendations) of use of force on detained people with mental ill health within immigration removal centres. The review must consider: how, when and whether to use … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government stated it was working with HMPPS, NHS England, and DHSC to develop new operational standards for the use of force on detained people with mental ill health, rather than commissioning an independent review (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This work was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). An independent review in August 2025 noted that mental health provision was improving but remained inadequate for demand, and that the percentage of detainees assessed at higher risk had increased (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025). As of March 2026, the completion of the new operational standards or the commissioning of an independent review has not been confirmed.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
17
Accepted in Part
Mandatory use of force debrief training and multi-level review process
Recommendation
The Home Office must ensure, as a matter of urgency, that training is delivered on how to conduct an effective use of force incident debrief, ensuring that issues of detained person and staff welfare, as well as training needs, are … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government referenced training and escalation systems for use of force incidents, and stated that the Service Improvement Plan included use of force monthly meetings and formal review processes (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). An independent review in August 2025 noted functioning complaints procedures and the appointment of two new Diversity Coordinators, but did not specifically confirm the implementation of mandatory use of force debrief training or a multi-level review process (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
18
Accepted in Part
Update DSO on food and fluid refusal management and reporting
Recommendation
The Home Office must, as a matter of urgency, update Detention Services Order 03/2017: Care and Management of Detained Individuals Refusing Food and/or Fluid, to ensure that it deals with: food and fluid refusal being clearly and directly linked to … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office published an updated Detention Services Order (DSO) on food and fluid refusal, which links food and fluid refusal to consideration of the Rule 35 process and the Adults at Risk policy (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was marked as completed and closed as of October 2024 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
19
Not Accepted
Healthcare staff guidance and training on use of force incidents
Recommendation
The Home Office must ensure that guidance is issued to healthcare staff in immigration removal centres clarifying their role in use of force incidents. It must liaise as necessary with NHS England and any relevant medical regulators. The Home Office … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government did not accept this recommendation, stating that NHS England commissions healthcare services and is responsible, alongside the Care Quality Commission, for assuring the quality of health service provision within the detention estate (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This rejection was confirmed in a parliamentary update in January 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
20
Accepted in Part
Update guidance on fit to fly and fit for detention medical assessments
Recommendation
The Home Office must review and update Detention Services Order 01/2016: The Protection, Use and Sharing of Medical Information Relating to People Detained Under Immigration Powers, to ensure that guidance given to GPs working in the immigration detention estate in … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government acknowledged NHS England's commissioning responsibility for healthcare services and stated that 'fit to fly' letters are a medico-legal practice outside NHS England's direct responsibility (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). As of March 2026, specific evidence of Detention Services Order 01/2016 being reviewed and updated, or clear guidance issued to GPs on their duties for 'fit to fly and fit for detention' assessments, has not been publicly detailed.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
21
Accepted in Part
Update mental vulnerability and mental capacity DSO guidance
Recommendation
The Home Office must review and update Detention Services Order 04/2020: Mental Vulnerability and Immigration Detention: Non-Clinical Guidance to set out comprehensive guidance for detention and healthcare staff where there are concerns that a detained person is suffering mental ill … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government stated it was considering policy on detained people with mental ill health as part of wider work on vulnerable adults, and scoping requirements with NHS England (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This was on track for closure by summer 2025 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). However, a High Court ruling in December 2025 found a systemic disconnect between the Adults at Risk policy, ACDT systems, and Rule 35 processes at Brook House (AH and IS v SSHD [2025] EWHC 3269 (Admin), 15 December 2025). An independent review in August 2025 also noted insufficient progress, with very limited engagement with charities and 10 people, including 3 assessed as adults at risk, released homeless in the past year (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
22
Accepted in Part
Update healthcare complaints handling guidance
Recommendation
The Home Office must review and update Detention Services Order 03/2015: Handling of Complaints to ensure that appropriate guidance is given to healthcare providers on the investigation and handling of complaints specific to the provision of healthcare in an immigration … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that a comprehensive review of complaints processes, including medical complaints, was underway, with Detention Services Orders (DSOs) to be updated upon completion (Official government response, 19 March 2024). This recommendation was marked as completed and closed as of October 2024 (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). An independent review in August 2025 noted that complaints procedures were functioning, but did not provide specific details on updated guidance for healthcare providers on handling medical complaints (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, August 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
23
Accepted in Part
Quarterly assessment of staffing levels against population needs
Recommendation
The Home Office and contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that there is ongoing assessment of staffing levels (at least on a quarterly basis), so that the level of staff present within each centre is appropriate for the size … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office implemented a new staffing model, which it stated delivered a "considerably healthier ratio of custodial staff per detained individual" compared to 2017, and contract reviews address safe staffing policies (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). However, the Inquiry Chair, Kate Eves, described the government's overall response as "inadequate" in September 2024, warning that abuse could reoccur.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
24
Accepted in Part
Mandatory staff training on mental health and trauma-informed approaches
Recommendation
The Home Office, in conjunction with contractors, must ensure that all relevant immigration removal centre staff receive mandatory introductory and annual training on: mental health; race and diversity; a trauma-informed approach; their own resilience; drug awareness; and the purpose of … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that the Initial Training Course for all new contractor staff was undergoing a full review to include mental health awareness, racial awareness, and safeguarding children, alongside a mentorship phase and annual refresher training (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons reported in September 2025 that staffing levels and capability were strengthened, with training on the "Monitor, Challenge and Support" process implemented (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 3 September 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
25
Accepted in Part
Ensure senior manager presence and accessibility to staff
Recommendation

Contractors operating immigration removal centres must ensure that senior managers are regularly present and visible within the immigration removal centre and are accessible to more junior detention staff.

Published evidence summary
The government stated that contractors are required to ensure senior managers are regularly present and visible within immigration removal centres (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). The Inquiry Chair, Kate Eves, however, described the government's overall response as "inadequate" in September 2024.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
26
Accepted in Part
Ensure Home Office staff presence and visibility in IRCs
Recommendation

The Home Office must ensure that its staff are regularly present and visible within each immigration removal centre.

Published evidence summary
The Home Office initiated the expansion of its Detention Engagement Team and further recruitment to increase its staff presence in Immigration Removal Centres (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "completed and closed as of October 2024" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons reported in September 2025 a reduction in use of force incidents and detainees reporting feeling safer, with good de-escalation practices observed (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 3 September 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
27
Accepted in Part
Action plan to address staff desensitisation and secondary trauma
Recommendation
Contractors operating immigration removal centres must develop and implement an action plan to ensure a safe and healthy staff culture in immigration removal centres. The action plan must address: the identification of and response to any sign of desensitisation among … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government introduced a code of conduct and a mandatory staff engagement strategy, and stated that the Initial Training Course review addresses staff wellbeing and secondary trauma awareness (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "due for closure by end of January 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). HM Inspectorate of Prisons reported in September 2025 improved body-worn camera usage, increased staff visibility, and effective de-escalation practices (HM Inspectorate of Prisons, 3 September 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
28
Accepted in Part
Address barriers to detainee complaints including fear of repercussions
Recommendation
The Home Office and its contractors operating immigration removal centres must take steps to identify and address the barriers to making complaints that are faced by detained people, including a fear of repercussions. This must include training for staff on … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office initiated a comprehensive review of complaints processes, involving engagement with detainees, the Independent Monitoring Board, and the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, with Detention Services Orders to be updated upon completion (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "due for closure by end of January 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). The Inquiry Chair, Kate Eves, described the government's overall response as "inadequate" in September 2024.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
29
Accepted in Part
Improve Professional Standards Unit investigation procedures and training
Recommendation
The Home Office must update Detention Services Order 03/2015: Handling of Complaints to clarify that, in investigations carried out by the Professional Standards Unit into allegations of serious misconduct against contractor staff: Professional Standards Unit investigators must carry out interviews … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Professional Standards Unit (PSU) updated its training to incorporate Brook House Inquiry findings, including training on interviewing vulnerable witnesses, and an embedded use of force expert was added to the unit (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "due for closure by end of January 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). The Inquiry Chair, Kate Eves, described the government's overall response as "inadequate" in September 2024.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
30
Not Accepted
Enhance Professional Standards Unit independence and seniority
Recommendation
The Home Office must: take steps to enhance the independence of the Professional Standards Unit from the Home Office and the perception of this independence; and increase the seniority of the Head of the Professional Standards Unit so that they … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government rejected this recommendation, stating that the seniority of the Head of the Professional Standards Unit would not be changed, and expressed confidence in existing ACAS Code compliance and Prisons and Probation Ombudsman escalation routes (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 confirmed that this recommendation was among three that had been rejected (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025).
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
31
Accepted in Part
Update whistleblowing DSO with anonymous reporting mechanisms
Recommendation
The Home Office must update Detention Services Order 03/2020: Whistleblowing – The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 to require contractors that run immigration removal centres to: have a whistleblowing policy and procedure that is specific to the immigration detention environment; … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Home Office stated that a broader complaints and whistleblowing review was underway, covering whistleblowing processes, a review of Detention Services Orders, and improving the visibility of these processes within Immigration Removal Centres (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). No further public update on its completion has been identified since that date.
Home Office (Primary)
View Details
32
Accepted in Part
Strengthen Independent Monitoring Board statutory footing and responsiveness
Recommendation
The government must: respond to and publish responses to all concerns raised by any Independent Monitoring Board regarding immigration removal centres; take steps without further delay to amend the Detention Centre Rules 2001, in so far as they govern Independent … Read more
Published evidence summary
The Ministry of Justice committed in its 2021 Prisons Strategy White Paper to pursue legislative reform to provide Independent Monitoring Boards (IMBs) with a statutory framework, with an intention to legislate "as soon as Parliamentary time allows" (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). No further public update on the introduction of legislation or completion of this recommendation has been identified since that date.
33
Accepted in Part
Improve HMIP and IMB evidence gathering and reporting processes
Recommendation
HM Inspectorate of Prisons and Independent Monitoring Boards working within immigration removal centres must ensure that they have robust processes for: obtaining and reporting on an enhanced range of evidence and intelligence from detained people and those who represent or … Read more
Published evidence summary
The government stated it was considering its reliance on external scrutiny organisations, noting that this recommendation was primarily directed at HM Inspectorate of Prisons (HMIP) and Independent Monitoring Boards (IMBs) (Govt response, 19 March 2024). A parliamentary question in January 2025 indicated this recommendation was "on track for closure by summer 2025" (Angela Eagle, Written PQ 23170, 15 January 2025). No further public update on the completion of this recommendation or specific details of improved evidence gathering and reporting processes by HMIP and IMBs have been identified since that date.
HM Inspectorate of Prisons (Primary)
View Details